| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,108 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189340 Posts |
Quote: TL;DR: authoring useful websites is hard. =P 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2627 Posts |
I agree that the website redesign is horrid. The entire product schedule should be viewable in a single click, not eight clicks ( I bookmarked this link to get around that). But that inconvenience pales in comparison to the scrubbing of historical information and photos from the new website. The Commemorative Coins page is an example. Whereas before they had separate pages for every commemorative program, now they only have pages for the three most recent programs, and even those three have considerably less information than they did under the old website!  Meanwhile, much of the historical information about and photos of past coin programs and types are gone. The redesign gets an F in my book.  I'll note that to access all the missing information, I use the Wayback Machine. It's very sluggish and cumbersome, but it offers a fun way to explore the Mint's past websites and products. Also on a different subject, I seem to recall a thread from @CelticKnot looking for old Mint product codes, and the Wayback Machine would be a good source for those.
Edited by CollegeBarbers 05/05/2025 3:27 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5627 Posts |
The U S Dis-Appointmints deserve an Outstanding F for Failure. The site " use to be " easily navigable, Easily read, Simple to browse at a Touch. Now, The system seems that they are appealing to the newer, Younger, More computer savvy clients, Not us Ole Coin Collectors, .....  @ Celtic, I Understand, There's always Tomorrow, Feel Better, My Friend....  PS, On the ever so possible chance a person of determination and fortitude comes along, That can make a difference, Please give us back the " old " site,............................. 
Edited by Morgans Dad 05/05/2025 6:26 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1776 Posts |
As someone who is a marketer, it seems to me the site has been redesigned to maximize SEO (search engine optimization). We've had to make changes to our corporate site that are similar - they don't help the user experience. The reality is you need to get folks to the website first.
So focus some of your angst toward Alphabet (Google).
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189340 Posts |
Quote: The reality is you need to get folks to the website first. This is true. Quote: So focus some of your angst toward Alphabet (Google). 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6554 Posts |
Hrm. I don't think that causing more website impressions should come at a cost of usability. Otherwise you are trading slightly more traffic for a lowered probability of completing a sale (which is the real point of the website).
What about the redesign would make it better for SEO?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189340 Posts |
Quote: Hrm. I don't think that causing more website impressions should come at a cost of usability. True, but the path of least resistance in coding comes at the expense of user experience.  Quote: What about the redesign would make it better for SEO? From my own experience, wholesale platform change. So, you have to rebuild the site from scratch using the tools available.... Fast, Cheap, Reliable. Pick two. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
425 Posts |
The website is the website. Most modern technology is unreliable and not designed to be at all user friendly. Most of it approaches worthless in my book.
That being said, my only issue in 2025 beyond this with the Mint is that their so-called loyalty program for "free" budget postage has never engaged with my account. I no longer order anything from them that was not already on my subscription. Four plus months into 2025 and it remains broke. That is the lot I get for living in this technological age.
So not ordering anything from the mint saves having to work with a website, and since virtually all websites are designed by millennials with no grasp of reality or common sense, this web site does not stick out as worse than any other.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189340 Posts |
Quote: That being said, my only issue in 2025 beyond this with the Mint is that their so-called loyalty program for "free" budget postage has never engaged with my account. I no longer order anything from them that was not already on my subscription. Four plus months into 2025 and it remains broke. Funny, for the last few years I have received loyalty "free shipping" after my third subscription (all shipped free) has been delivered. For that reason, I am glad the things I want that are not on sub come out—or are at least still available—later in the year.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
850 Posts |
Redesign sucks but what is even worse is that CCAC meeting is no longer on the main page. You have to click the "Whats New" tab and scroll down. In the past they gave you brief summaries of meetings and pictures that were presented for coin/medal design. Now they just give you the minutes and a link to their youtube video for the full 1hr meeting. That is my biggest issue with the new update.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189340 Posts |
Bummer. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
  United States
12845 Posts |
Interesting commentary and thanks for absorbing my rant, everyone. At the time of my rant, I had *just* visited the web site and all I wanted to do was find out info on the upcoming privied 2025 ASEs, which there is none (like release date). It took 3 minutes of clicking "show more" on the upcoming releases page to get to the products I wanted to see to find the not-yet-available info. It is what it is; I understand that info isn't available yet, but it really would have been nice to find that out in 30 seconds vs 3 minutes. I think this horrible web UI design trend even applies to captive audiences in the corporate environment. I'm talking about giants like ServiceNow and Workday. Why would you make things so cryptic and unintuitve for people that are paying you gobs of money for your software? Yes I know the/several answer(s). Quote: The reality is you need to get folks to the website first. I don't see how that's relevant in this case, unless people were fleeing by the thousands, becuase there were already plenty of people shopping the site (2019 ERP and 2020 v70, anyone?). Once upon a time I went to the US mint site weekly or more but now I couldn't care less about the site, just like they do. I have most of the products I want already coming to me on subscription. If I could put the privy ASEs on subs I would to avoid having to deal with navigating this mess. I'm really looking forward to the next survey that pops up when I visit the Mint site next. In addition I do realize that clicks are revenue in a lot of cases and that clowns (ahem, "customers") like me that prefer to browse from a PC-based web browser are likely dwindling / aging out. Darn, I just ranted again. [/rant] I promise I'm done this time. It's not worth the keystrokes. Quote: @ Celtic, I Understand, There's always Tomorrow, Feel Better, My Friend.... Thanks @Morgans Dad. I just needed a deep breath. 
Edited by CelticKnot 05/10/2025 02:12 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5627 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189340 Posts |
The good news is they will probably rip & replace it again in the next few years.  The bad news is that could end up being worse. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97314 Posts |
When I first logged into the US Mint site, and tried to navigate the product schedule and continual clicking until I got to the end. At that point the URL changed up a bit to include ALL pages. The entire schedule. So I save That URL to my bookmarks. so now when I log in, I automatically click on my saved link and I get all the listings at once (one click) here it is: https://www.usmint.gov/product-sche...tmp=no&sz=70and it works for previous years as well (just change the date in the Address)
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,108 |
Page 2 of 2
|