Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

ID This Marcus Aurelius Denarius

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 4,051Next Topic
Page: of 2
New Member

United States
17 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  6:43 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add gn0s1s to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Could use some help ID'ing this:

ID-This-Marcus-Aurelius-Denarius

ID-This-Marcus-Aurelius-Denarius

The coin was sold as:

Obv: IMP M ANTONINVS AVG - Laureate head right. Rev: PROV DEOR TR P
XVII COS III - Providentia standing left, holding globe and cornucopia.
Rome mint: Dec AD 162 to Dec AD 163 = RIC III, 73, page 218 - Cohen 525
- RCV II = not listed/ 3.25 g.

However when compared to reference images of C 525, it doesn't match up.
Moderator
Learn More...
echizento's Avatar
United States
23731 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  7:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add echizento to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I have this coin as RIC III 66. Circa 162-163.
New Member
United States
17 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  9:09 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add gn0s1s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Was this what you were referring to?:

http://www.forumancientcoins.com/ga...at=0&pos=243

If so, the obv on the OP has a draped bust along with being bare headed.

Another question on ID'ing: Do the coins have to be an exact style match when finding a reference? Or are variations in obv/rev text as well as bust style allowed? Thanks for the help!
Pillar of the Community
Bing's Avatar
United States
4253 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  9:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bing to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It looks more like RIC 71 to me. Take a look at this image on wildwinds:

http://wildwinds.com/coins/ric/marc...RIC_0071.jpg
New Member
United States
17 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  9:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add gn0s1s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the tip! RIC 71 does look like a good match, but the "IMP" is missing on the obv of the OP. Does that matter?
New Member
United States
17 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  9:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add gn0s1s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Also noticed that the drapery is "full", as in it covers both shoulders whereas RIC 71 has slight drapery only on the left shoulder.
Moderator
Learn More...
echizento's Avatar
United States
23731 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  9:37 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add echizento to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
No image available from your link. The coins should match, with the bust, obverse and reverse legends and type. My reference ERIC II doesn't list your coin as bare headed, but all other aspects match. This could be an error in my reference material.
Moderator
Learn More...
echizento's Avatar
United States
23731 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  9:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add echizento to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well my reference does not list RIC 71 at all. So looks like another error has been found.
New Member
United States
17 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  9:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add gn0s1s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Earlier I tried to work out the coin in ERIC format. I think its the following:

Bust:
9) Bare headed, draped bust right

Obv:
23) M ANTONINVS AVG

Rev:
91) PROV DEOR TR P XVII COS III

Type:
140) Providentia standing left, holding globe and cornucopia.

B09, O23, R091, T140
Pillar of the Community
Bing's Avatar
United States
4253 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  9:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bing to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The legend should be exact and you are correct. RIC 71's legend does not match because of the "IMP". From waht I can find, the only match for the legend might be RIC 67 ( I can't find RIC 66 on wildwinds), but there is no drapery that I can see. Take a look at:

http://wildwinds.com/coins/ric/marc...RIC_0067.jpg
New Member
United States
17 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  10:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add gn0s1s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
RIC 67 is close, but the OBV text is off. It has an IMP II at the end of it.

The closest match I have found so far is RIC 48:

http://wildwinds.com/coins/ric/marc...RIC_0048.jpg

But there is no drapery and this is a P XVI, whereas the OP is P XVII and has drapery.
Pillar of the Community
Bing's Avatar
United States
4253 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  10:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bing to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The reverse legend is off from RIC 48. It should be TRP XVII COS III, while RIC48 is TRP XVI. Hmm, this is interesting, but I'm sure one of us will put our finger on it sooner or later.
Pillar of the Community
Bing's Avatar
United States
4253 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  10:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bing to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well, my friend, I just consulted my copy of RIC and it's not listed there. But remember, RIC was done some 80 years ago and many coins have been uncovered since. It's just not listed in RIC is about all you can say at this point.
New Member
United States
17 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  10:26 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add gn0s1s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Another odd characteristic is that it appears *slightly* smaller than my other denarii. Here it is next to a Elagabalus AR denarius RIC IV-II, 146:

ID-This-Marcus-Aurelius-Denarius

ID-This-Marcus-Aurelius-Denarius

My scale is broken, so I have no way to weigh it for the time being.

At first I was really concerned that it might be a fake, but the side cracks look good and I can see obvious signs of silver crystallization when examined through a loupe. I am by no means an expert, but if it is fake its probably a better fake.
New Member
United States
17 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  10:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add gn0s1s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The information that came with the coin claims that it was found near Brampton, Norfolk England. Not sure if that helps.
Moderator
Learn More...
echizento's Avatar
United States
23731 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2012  10:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add echizento to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That's a big difference. There is no visible signs of this being a fouree, I wonder if this is an unoffical issue stuck on the outskirts of the empire?
  Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 4,051Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.36 seconds to rattle this change. Forums