| Author |
Replies: 57 / Views: 6,137 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
quote: If a buyer completes their part of the transaction in a timely manner that is when you should rate their half of the transaction.
 100/100
|
|
Forum Dad
 United States
24180 Posts |
quote: If a buyer completes their part of the transaction in a timely manner that is when you should rate their half of the transaction.
So if you mail me a check 30 seconds after the auction, and I get it the next day, are you OK with me immediately negging you when I get it?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Well...I for one have never asked a rating from a seller. Conversely, I simply skip rating any seller whom I've contacted to resolve a problem and it appears they have issues. That's the downside of trying to hold all the cards. Maybe some think the "bad buyers" deserve it, but other people who conduct their business legitimately get fed up. I don't have to play those games with people--and they won't get my repeat business  Then again, this whole topic shouldn't be about buyer vs. seller--it's about establishing a reasonable buyer--seller relationship so these issues don't get out of control. If a buyer or seller is constantly butting heads with people, they need to step back and rethink their approach. That is, if they care. 
Edited by KurtS 02/23/2008 10:00 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1077 Posts |
Why would you do that? Surely if you get the check the next day that is a good thing? As for the quote from the other board:- "...As a seller, I believe that the feedback change will make it more difficult to sell..." This person gives no explanation or reasoning for believing this. Just because someone believes it, it does not make it so! "... As a buyer, I think it will reduce the amount of sellers willing to sell on ebay..." Again no reason given. It WILL reduce the number of sellers, hopefully it will get rid of a lot of the unscrupulous ones.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
168 Posts |
"dcarver - Please explain how the new policy encourages buyer to pay quicker. I feel it is just the opposite...buyers who want to pay slower or not at all can now do so without fear of receiving negative feedback."
i was asked to explain and I will...I'm now rewarded for paying...simply put. I'm not judged on some stupid seller's version of what constitutes a good transaction from their vantage point only. the buyer's job is to pay within the rules of time. if the buyer does that then they should receive their positive feedback and the seller should likewise receive theirs when the item is received in the manner with which it was advertised. what's hard to understand about that? too many loopholes and silly control issues are happening with the current system...one thing is for sure if the new policy doesn't work then it can be restructured again...no one is saying this new policy is perfect...we do live on planet earth where nothing is perfect.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1077 Posts |
I still say that the best solution is for neither party to leave feedback first. ebay should set the system up so that feedback is only revealed after it has been left by both parties. It is the only fair way to do it that both buyers and sellers will agree on. However I don't think a little "Caveat Venditor" on ebay will hurt.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
790 Posts |
I do like the idea of revealing feedback only after both parties have left it! However, I have lef untold positive feedback as a buyer that has never been reciprocated. However, as a buyer that tends to pay within a few minutes (I guess hours if the auction closes at a weird time) I resent the idea that the seller can "hold me hostage". I have NEVER returned an item (I have over 500 positives as a buyer and untold numbers of total transactions, member since 1996). A few weeks ago I bought an item for $18 which had $4 shipping (total $22). The seller said no Paypal under $20 (not written in the auction). I was out of checks and was in the middle of an order. It took me a while to pay, much longer than normal. Anyway, the description said the coin (proof) is so shiny that a good picture is not possible turned out to be so dirty and toned. I did not return it, I sucked it up. I really wanted to send a negative, but did not for fear of a negative as the seller did not leave any feedback.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1077 Posts |
By revealing the feedback after both have left it, it would also encourage those sellers that don't bother to, to leave the buyer feedback. Then if they don't bother at least they won't receive the positive feedback the buyer has left.
|
|
Forum Dad
 United States
24180 Posts |
quote: Why would you do that? Surely if you get the check the next day that is a good thing?
Because you have one lousy responsibility and you blew it and wasted my time. My listing very clearly states no checks. You're negged OK? Every single week we list, at least one buyer doesn't read the listing.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1077 Posts |
OK, I didn't know you didn't take checks (or cheques even). Personally if I didn't take checks but received one in the post I would contact the buyer and remind them of that and ask for a different form of payment. I don't think that sending a check by mistake constitutes receiving negative feedback. It's not like they tried to avoid paying. Anyone can make an honest mistake. As humans we tend not to always read the small print, however large it is! I have had several sellers not read my notes to them when I send payment, but I don't give them negative feedback for it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
So did you neg the buyer before or after you cashed the check ?
and would you be happy with a retaliatory negative even though I'm the one who messed up .
|
|
Forum Dad
 United States
24180 Posts |
quote: Personally if I didn't take checks but received one in the post I would contact the buyer and remind them of that and ask for a different form of payment.
Difficult seller. Mailed back my check and made me go get a money order.And me... thanks to ebay... can't warn anyone...  Or I could avoided the neg when the buyer said "Look, you got my check, take it or I'll neg you." Once again....  Can't warn anyone.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5953 Posts |
As with any widely used exchange venue ebay Attracts good and bad people. The Buyer has by far the most control and power of any transaction on ebay. This tends to be attractive to the less morally inclined amongst the general population. Scamers and the dishonest are always looking for ways to rip people off and ebay provides a good venue for both sides the buyers and the sellers. The feedback number does not count much for me its the content that counts. A good seller can have really bad feedback. All it takes is a vindictive buyer. If you actually read the feedback its not hard to determine whats going on. With the new rules the good sellers are going to suffer as they will not be able to address this kind of feedback. Lets take the Check (Cheque) example I go to a public Auction and Fill out a bid card. On the card it clearly states no personal checks. I bid on my fake tiffany lamp and win it. At the End of the auction I go to the cashiers desk and hand over a personal check. The Auction company get upset arguments ensue (Verbal Feedback is exchanged)and I up in cuffs and carted away by the boys in blue. This is a little extreme but I have seen close to this at live auctions. ebay should be no different. If the buyer is to bid on an item he needs to be aware of what he needs to do to complete the contract should he be successful. If all the contract details are not specified; Such as shipping or payment methods then he should walk away and not bid. This means that the seller has to be very specific in the auctions. The good ebay sellers are. The buyer has ultimate control on ebay. If I see a blurry coin picture I should walk away and look for a better one. There are people however who will look at the text of the auction and see 'Beautiful','high grade','Perfect' and bid. I have no sympathy for them as they doing nothing but gambling. The seller is playing on greed and the buyer is also. A good seller will have clear pictures a clear description and include all the needed contract information. Even then its up to the buyer to check everything and make sure they agree before entering into a contract. This will never really happen on ebay as its just to easy to look, click and save the worry for later.. Good Sellers have to work really hard to stand out on ebay Bad ones need do very little. EBays new feedback rules will not affect the bad sellers very much but the good will surely suffer. The buyer will no longer be able to judge is the negative feedback given to a seller was really warranted. Forgive my rambling but I feel very strongly that buyers should take responsibility for their actions when the click the button. They have far more protection than the sellers.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
For the Record ,,I have already stated that I think ebay has stepped way past reasonable with this new rule ,, and I supported the boycott by not purchasing or selling on ebay. But that still leaves the problem and no amount of discussion here is going to change ebay's mind about the rules they wish to impose on either party ,buyer or seller . My objections come from one position and thats the rampant use of feedback blackmail ,,where a buyer cannot leave an honest negative feedback for a seller without being neg'ed in return ,, that is wrong and no amount of justification can void that reality . we as a forum have stood in the line of reporting bad sellers since the forums conception , we have tried without much success to help sellers who come here to respond to bad ebay deals that have been posted here, I'm sure that most you can remember those sellers even though few have stayed and participated . we have all stood with those buyers who have come here with bad ebay deals and symapthized with them for their circumstance at least I know I have ,even though we all knew that they would receive a negative for a negative .. now I feel for the Good sellers who will lose their voice in responding to bad buyers ,,but I have a hard time sympathizing with the bad sellers who have abused the system for so long and built very high positive feedbacks that make them look like great sellers when in reality they are crooks ,,we have all seen the names come and go in here . So to the Good Sellers I can sympathized with you ,, I can even help you when I buy from you by making the transaction as close to perfect as a buyer can ,, and I can leave honest feedback that accurately reflects the business that was conducted ,, but thats all I as a person can do . Metalman
|
|
Forum Mom
 United States
5877 Posts |
First of all, I want to clarify that we DO ACCEPT checks from established customers and CCF members. No one here was in violation of anything. I have considered this issue from both sides and what it amounts to is that I can continue to list on ebay or not. Aside from the new feedback system, I don't want to pay the new fees. Also, I prefer to be able to offer better deals to our members here and I enjoy transacting business with all of you. I am definitely leaning toward not listing on ebay any longer except for occasionally when I have an item that is high-priced and members of the forum have not shown an interest. I plan to offer all items to our members first. To me, that's the best way to go. It is up to ebay how they run their venue. All we can do is decide whether we want to play by their rules or not. Personally, I'm not even upset about their changes any longer. We're working on setting up our CCF Numismatics site and I probably should have done this a long time ago anyway. 
|
| |
Replies: 57 / Views: 6,137 |