| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 207 |
|
|
New Member
United States
16 Posts |
1884-O Morgan I think high AU but I'm very new to this.   |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
217 Posts |
 to CCF! Thanks for posting. Photos are always imperfect but it looks like you've done a good job on these. My guess is that you are in the right neighborhood with AU but would need to see in person how much luster is left on the coin. Personally I like to see the lettering crisper for a high AU, especially with slight wear on the cheek. It's also hard to tell definitively what cleaning might have occurred in the past, given some discolorations (that also could be influenced by lighting). If prior cleaning is problematic then a top grading service would likely call it something like "AU Details (Cleaned)." Others here at CCF really know a lot more about these things. If you are not familiar with VAM World Wiki (Google "Vamworld and 1884 O") or NGCcoin.com's Variety Plus, you should check them out to see if any varieties or errors can be found on a coin. Most often it seems that things like die cracks are more interesting than valuable in learning the history of the minting that made your coin. Stay well, Diy89Nurm7
|
|
New Member
United States
16 Posts |
yea lighting is a big issue I am struggling with when trying to take photos. also slight focus issues, because in person the liberty on the head band is crisp. possible old cleaning but I know they have been untouched since 1980 when my great grandfather passed.
Edited by PCM
02/22/2021 10:31 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
54844 Posts |
I'll say AU-55, but pics with more light on the obverse surfaces would be helpful. Those scratches look deep. to the CCF! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9134 Posts |
58 sharpness but low eye appeal due to marks, abrasions and that hard hit on the cheek, luster breaks a lot, would probably holder as a 50 or at most a 53.
Longhorn Coins & Exonumia Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
473 Posts |
AU 55 could be MS60 if there is more lustre than the photos suggest.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9794 Posts |
typically the 84(O) are soft in strike. yours is above average for strike. the hair around the ear is defined and feathers on the breast are there. luster is broken and missing across both sides and there is not much remaining on the reverse, maybe 25% on the obverse. its difficult to determine, because of the lighting, if what appears to be a scratch across the chin is deep or surface. my gut is saying the scratch is not deep enough to pull a details designation. the reverse is leading me to an AU grade but lack of luster and the other issues noted is keeping me from going 58. my grade is AU55.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9578 Posts |
Mid AU for me, 53 possibly 55. That mark across the lower jaw looks severe.
1883-O Nut
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
21948 Posts |
Under all the toning I think there is an AU-58 coin.
|
|
New Member
United States
16 Posts |
I really have got to figure out the lighting thing. Ive tried taking a few more pictures and they all seem to have this same tone even when the coin doesn't.
Edited by PCM
02/23/2021 9:22 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5408 Posts |
Luster loss on the reverse would drop it below mint state. The strike does look above-average for an O-mint Morgan. The gash along the jaw should net-grade the coin to AU-55 at best.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 207 |
|
Posted 02/22/2021 10:15 pm
