Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 411 |
|
New Member
United States
12 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
3261 Posts |
|
New Member
United States
12 Posts |
Thank you very much! I will read up on this with the link you sent me now!
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
3261 Posts |
|
Bedrock of the Community

United States
61632 Posts |
|
Bedrock of the Community

United States
15452 Posts |
pretty nice and strong die clash, nice find.
|
New Member
United States
12 Posts |
Thank you everyone! I learned something new!
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3467 Posts |
Great Eyes, Sweet Find.... Thanks Again COOP for the overlays 
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
2942 Posts |
 to the CCF If it was a clash, it should be incused. This looks to be raised maybe a well placed die chip.
|
Valued Member
United States
332 Posts |
As I have learned these clashes are somewhat common. However, knowing how die clashes are formed will expand your knowledge of a particular type of mint error. Though they have no real additional value, having one in your collection checks a box. My 1967 LMC. 
Edited by NY Islander 01/31/2023 11:24 pm
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
3261 Posts |
Quote: If it was a clash, it should be incused. This looks to be raised maybe a well placed die chip Cujohn, the clash shows the "absent" area, the incuse area, which, then in turn, is raised. If you look at what my arrow is pointing at, it's the field, inside the chin, not the chin itself.
-makecents-
|
Bedrock of the Community

United States
61632 Posts |
The double clash marks is from two different clash events. If the die rotates because of the clash, it will show a second clash mark from die rotation.  These are striking events that create die events, that transfer on to the coins. Not a plus. Just looks interesting. (Kind of like seeing a magician perform a feat. When you learn how it is done, then your no longer impressed)
|
|
Replies: 11 / Views: 411 |
|