Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 787 |
|
New Member
7 Posts |
Hey Guys, I'm new to the coin community, but I've spent the past couple months sifting through thousands of Mercury dimes and I've come across one that I can't identify. This 1941microS is a pretty wild coin - it looks like almost everything on both sides of the coin has some nice doubling. The details on the coin are so pronounced that it almost looks like a proof being struck twice, albeit off-center. I don't think it should qualify as full band, but I'm not sure. Lastly, it's tough to see from these pics but it has retained an unusual amount of luster over the years (more on the back).  I won't flood the post with pics, but there are a lot of details to observe. The S/S is probably the single most distinguishable feature, but I couldn't even find a listing to simply value that. What do you guys think? Do I have anything interesting here?
|
|
New Member
Topic Starter7 Posts |
Here is front and back:  
|
Moderator
 United States
51628 Posts |
 The proof version was minted at Philly and it has no mint mark. Your S mint mark looks like circulation damage/flattening not an RPM. I see no doubled die. Here are two links on dimes: http://varietyvista.com/ http://doubleddie.com/Also, your coin is not FB=full bands. John1 
( I'm no pro, it's just my humble opinion ) Searched 6.5 +/- Million Cents Since 1971
|
Moderator
 United States
51628 Posts |
Also, no micro S in 1941 only in 1945. There is a large S and small S in 1941. John1 
( I'm no pro, it's just my humble opinion ) Searched 6.5 +/- Million Cents Since 1971
|
New Member
Topic Starter7 Posts |
Well that's a bummer, but I appreciate the answer. I'm a little confused now though, if it's not doubling what am I looking at? Also, the S does look squished but under a microscope it is pretty clear there are 2 s's. I'm fairly certain about that as I have a lot of coins to compare against each other. 
|
Moderator
 United States
51628 Posts |
( I'm no pro, it's just my humble opinion ) Searched 6.5 +/- Million Cents Since 1971
|
Moderator
 United States
128288 Posts |
 to the Community! Your post was moved to the appropriate forum for the proper attention. 
|
New Member
Topic Starter7 Posts |
Oh sorry about that!
Thanks for the links, it looks like I have reading up to do.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3384 Posts |
Judging by the line in the left reverse rim I'm thinking there was some serious chattering of the dies during the strike, i.e. MD.
|
Moderator
 United States
128288 Posts |
Quote: Oh sorry about that! No problem. It was an easy fix. 
|
New Member
Topic Starter7 Posts |
I didn't notice that either until looking at that photo.
So basically this coin has a non-collectible form of doubling, correct? It's a shame as it looks very unique and sticks out like a sore thumb. I suppose I will just stash it.
|
New Member
Topic Starter7 Posts |
One last thing; does the W on this 1942d display a collectible doubling variety? I'm educating myself quickly. 
|
|
Replies: 11 / Views: 787 |
|