Question Regarding Hudson's Bay Tokens

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Author	Replies: 3 / Views: 940
1960NYGiants Pillar of the Community United States 666 Posts	Posted 01/14/2025 1:59 pm My 1st HBC token. PCGS attributes this as FT-3 Eastmain. When I checked my Charlton it shows the Eastmain pieces without the punch mark between NB. Charlton then shows the Moose Factory pieces having a punch mark between NB. My piece has the punch mark which I assume is a Moose Factory issue (FT-7). I have a n old copy of the Gingras catalogue which does not mention Moose Factory but show a mix of punched and non-punched pieces for Eastmain. Can anyone provide detail for the difference, i.e. Eastmain vs. Moose Factory? LM of RCNA Member of CATC Report this Post to the Staff

jbuck Moderator United States 187475 Posts	Posted 01/14/2025 2:53 pm Very nice! Coin Collector Since 1978 Avatar Old Avatar 7070 Eisenhower Australia Canada World CCF Members on eBay CCF eBay Search Engine Report this Post to the Staff
blargish Valued Member United States 178 Posts	Posted 01/16/2025 03:23 am I'm not sure which Charlton you have, but the 10th edition quotes a letter from James Anderson, the chief factor of the HBC at Moose Factory, to the governor of the HBC concerning the shipping of tokens not in use at Eastmain. In it, he states that he "shall have them marked so as to be known from those used in East Main Distt." I imagine that this is inferred to be the punch mark. I haven't found any other reference that addresses this specifically, but an article by Willey (Nov 1982 CNJ) has a different take, asserting that the punch mark was used to cancel them upon presentation for redemption in Eastmain. Report this Post to the Staff
1960NYGiants Pillar of the Community United States 666 Posts	Posted 01/17/2025 9:04 pm Thanks @blargish I have the 11th edition and saw that write up. It did not state how they were going to be marked. Gingras and Willey both state that the punch mark meant it was cancelled. Is it possible that the letter mentioned in Charlton was found after Gingras/Willey and others published their opinions? The value of the piece is the same with or without the punch mark. I listed it as FT-3/FT-7 in my collection inventory. LM of RCNA Member of CATC Report this Post to the Staff
	Replies: 3 / Views: 940

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

All Forums Category: Canadian Coins and Currency Forums Forum: Canadian Coins and Colonial Tokens

Silver Gold Bull US is the United States leading bullion dealer. We deliver gold coins, gold bars, silver coins, silver bars and precious metals to your door. Order today!

The First Dollar, your premier source for bullion and rare coins. See our bullion list on the site and the coin inventory on ebay.

View Last 100 New Topics

View Last 100 Active Topics

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum

It took 0.16 seconds to rattle this change.