Coin Community Family of Web Sites
300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop CCF Members on eBay! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Proof Jefferson Nickels (1938-1942, 1950-1964, 1968-2003)

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 809Next Topic  
New Member

United States
49 Posts
 Posted 09/19/2025  1:40 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Longacre Fan to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
What are your thoughts on proof Jefferson nickels? Surprisingly, I find myself drawn to the proofs from 1938-1964. Yesterday, I bought a 1942 Type 1 5C graded PF 66 by NGC. It's a beaut! What is your favorite proof Jefferson nickels and why?

Sorry for not uploading an image, but, going through the process gives me a headache.

Here's the NGC cert number: 245782-014
(The holder is one of the "fatty" ones, so, no NGC images.)

Here's an ebay link to three 1942 Type 1 Nickels graded PF 66 by NGC. (One seller looks like he's way off base on asking price. Hope this helps with visuals: https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nk...&_dcat=41087

Edited by Longacre Fan
09/19/2025 1:53 pm
Pillar of the Community
Humanist1287's Avatar
United States
1108 Posts
 Posted 09/19/2025  3:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Humanist1287 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
As an avid Jefferson series lover, I enjoy them. Honestly, my favorites are the ones from 1970 and older. I have all proofs from 1956 until 2005.
The ones that are from the 50's, 60's etc I really enjoy the strike and the way they look compared to the more modern (after 1970) frosty, cameo type appearence.

I had considered purchasing some of the older proofs from the 30's and 40's, but pretty costly for me.

Some of my various Jefferson proofs/SMS.
My favorite in particular is the 2005 Bison design, especially in proof. Beautiful coin
Proof-Jefferson-Nickels-1938-1942,-1950-1964,-1968-2003
Proof-Jefferson-Nickels-1938-1942,-1950-1964,-1968-2003
Proof-Jefferson-Nickels-1938-1942,-1950-1964,-1968-2003
Edited by Humanist1287
09/19/2025 3:13 pm
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
Marv65's Avatar
United States
10478 Posts
 Posted 09/19/2025  10:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Marv65 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I find myself drawn to the proofs from 1938-1964. Yesterday, I bought a 1942 Type 1 5C graded PF 66 by NGC. It's a beaut! What is your favorite proof Jefferson nickels and why?


Cameos from 59 and earlier are my favorites, newer dates are always CAM/DCAM because of the newer minting processes.

"How a Frosty Coin is Struck: Coin Cameo History
When looking at a coin, there are two basic portions that we can refer to: the devices, also known as the raised design elements, and the fields, commonly called the flat background. Although these two portions of the coin can exhibit a uniform appearance, they can also exhibit a two-toned appearance. These two tones are known as frosted, which appears as white on the devices, and mirrored, which appears as black on the fields. When a coin exhibits frosted devices and mirrored fields, it is known as Cameo contrast. Coins that exhibit stark Cameo contrast are highly sought after and generally thought of as having the highest level of eye appeal.

Although common in the modern era of coin production, Cameo contrast used to be a tremendous rarity before 1973. Prior to '73, only the first few coins struck from fresh dies were able to exhibit cameo contrast.

During the 1950s dies were pickled in a 95% alcohol and 5% nitric acid solution. This gave the die a frosted aesthetic. Subsequently, the fields would be polished away which left them with a brilliant finish. When these dies would strike coins, the frosted devices and brilliant fields would be impressed onto the coins. Each successive coin that was struck exhibited less cameo frost due to the intense pressure of each strike. After a few dozen coins were struck, you would eventually be left with fully brilliant coins instead of coins with cameo contrast.

Starting in 1973, the United States Mint discontinued the use of die pickling and began experimenting with sandblasting. Sandblasting is the process of cleaning or roughening a surface using a jet of sand propelled by compressed air or steam. The impact of the sand on the surface of the coin die would impart a frosted finish. After the sandblasting, the fields were polished exactly like they were done in the 1950s. Finally, the die was then chromium plated in order to protect the surface of the die. In turn, this allowed for a much larger amount of Cameo coins to be struck per die.

By 1977, the U.S. Mint was more or less able to perfect the art of cameo coins. At this point in time, it became nearly impossible to find coins that were struck in Proof that did not exhibit at least some Cameo contrast. The main issue then was the packaging. The casing used for Proof coinage was not inert, meaning that the chemicals in the plastic wrap were interacting negatively with the coins. The use of this detrimental material caused unsightly toning and spotting on many of the Proof coins of this era, effectively ruining their Proof aesthetic."

Pillar of the Community
cladking's Avatar
United States
2270 Posts
 Posted 09/20/2025  09:27 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cladking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Despite their beauty people tend to take the later proofs, most proofs really, for granted because they are considered so common. And most are common so people look elsewhere for something to collect. Many proofs especially the high mintage proofs after 1955, are far less common than most realize because of attrition and degradation. Many dates never were terribly common as frosted specimens from new dies.

Some day proof nickels could catch on just because they are available and are beautiful. In the meantime you can pick them up for 40c apiece. Building collections of these can be a challenging and rewarding pursuit.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Brandmeister's Avatar
United States
6454 Posts
 Posted 09/20/2025  11:33 am  Show Profile   Check Brandmeister's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Brandmeister to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I built a folder of 1956-2005 proof nickels very economically. My collection also includes some earlier proof nickels. As others have pointed out, those are more expensive.

I suppose the most exciting Jefferson proofs to own would be the 1942-P War Nickel proof and the first year 1938 proof. There are also some interesting and relatively expensive varieties.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94765 Posts
 Posted 09/20/2025  7:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I have one each (at least) of every year the Jefferson nickel produced proofs, some in slabs, but most in my Dansco albums. no one proof is more a favorite than another..
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 809Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.36 seconds to rattle this change. Forums