Looks like the others posted here already. Possible Retained Cud on the obverse. The reverses advance to something else. Not sure what to call it yet. Always nice to see what is happening on this new design. We have already seen where a die clash has been affecting some of the die chips: Looks like the reverse die on the image I added had something happen at the same time/or later to the reverse die. Going to have Mike Diamond sound in on these?
The first coin features a bifacial grease strike and a strongly elevated Retained Cud on the obverse face (struck by the anvil die). There's no reason to think the two errors are related. The reverse of the second coin may show an unusually prominent, bi-level (stepped) die crack or a die crack that transitions from bi-level to conventional. But the photo is far from ideal.
Coin # 2: http://goccf.com/t/424922 On the obverse of the other coin, it looks just like this coin: Thus the linking to the two coins. (Actually there are three on the forum now)
I feel these will have a premium, but not as much as a Cud. If feel the obverse was affected with a strong die clash. So these could happen on different dies failing or be from the same die. Hard to tell for sure yet. The clash area of the reverse design could affect more that one die to me. So there might be more of these happening on this design of the reverse. (Kind of interesting the name "Mankiller", and George being affected that way)
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use