Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Two Different Error Type Lincoln'?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,131Next Topic  
New Member
twylite's Avatar
United States
15 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2006  01:54 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add twylite to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hope this comes out right. I posted in another form that I had a 1973 penny which the back formed a cross like imprint, when it is a 1978. The other is a 1957-D penny that sticks to a magnet.


Image: Two-Different-Error-Type-Lincoln’? 1978crossedfr.jpg
44.02 KB

Image: Two-Different-Error-Type-Lincoln’? 1978crossed.jpg
42.68 KB

Image: Two-Different-Error-Type-Lincoln’? 1957dfr.jpg
42.63 KB

Image: Two-Different-Error-Type-Lincoln’? 1957dbk.jpg
46.92 KB
Pillar of the Community
Metalman's Avatar
United States
7123 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2006  02:27 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Metalman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
the 1978 cent is what is known as a sqeeze job,, someone has placed 2 cents together and then by force impressed one onto the other, it is not an error

There is really no way to attribute the planchet from a photo, it appears to be of the proper size for the Lincoln Cent, can you give us a very accurate weight? and size in MM?


Rick

Pillar of the Community
coppercoins's Avatar
United States
7629 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2006  03:01 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coppercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The 1978 is actually a blob of glue or something added to the coin, then was set on another coin while the substance dried. If it were a squeeze job the impression would be directly into the cent whereas this job the impression is on something above the surface of the coin.

The 1957 cent was plated in something magnetic. It is not original from the mint as it is, the details are too soft and the coin takes on a plated look. A wrong planchet coin would still look like a naturally struck coin but would have different characteristics in the metal - such as it being magnetic.
New Member
twylite's Avatar
United States
15 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2006  03:17 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add twylite to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks guys, for posting so quickly too! I'm scimming threw the forums. Trying not to post same questions. LOL
Thank you ;-)
Pillar of the Community
scoutjim99's Avatar
United States
4589 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2006  03:53 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add scoutjim99 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Please do feel free, to ask any question you do have thought- with out hesitation
Pillar of the Community
Metalman's Avatar
United States
7123 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2006  10:15 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Metalman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Coppercoins is right about the 78 I see the build up now that I did not see late last night when I posted,,

I still do not think that the 57 can be attributed by photo without more info .

Rick
Pillar of the Community
TreasHunt's Avatar
United States
2540 Posts
 Posted 01/01/2007  07:57 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TreasHunt to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The color on the 1957 looks very artificial. I agree that it is probably plated, but we'll only know if it is submitted to ANACS.
Bedrock of the Community
biokemist6's Avatar
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 01/03/2007  2:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The 1957 is copper-colored and magnetic, correct? I just saw an article on ICGs website about a 1937 Lincoln Cent they examined that was magnetic- apparently the copper alloy was contaminated with enough iron (2%) to make it magnetic.
http://www.icgcoin.com/Default.aspx?tabid=752
New Member
twylite's Avatar
United States
15 Posts
 Posted 01/04/2007  02:38 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add twylite to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you again. In addition, thank you biokemist6, for the link. I did the test comparing other 1957-D cents to that one. It was the only one attracted to the magnet. Yes, it looks funny, however, all around the edges are copper tone, no silver dips drips runs perfect. The back is perfect, silver color, the front is a little blotchy around Lincoln' cheekbones. I do not know I do know I am not letting it go and as soon as I can, I am going to send it to someone who can run some test on it. If it is correct in weight etc. (which seems to be the same as others) What will that mean? Nothing or something?
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,131Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.24 seconds to rattle this change. Forums