Playing With Lighting (Axial Vs. Direct)

Sweet, that's exactly what I was looking for. Thanks! I'll make sure that's set up correctly tonight. I have just noticed a slight amount of focus problems, but I wasn't sure if it was a plane problem with my lens/copy stand or if the coin was not sitting flat in the NGC holder. If it's the camera and copy stand that's a universal fix....but when it's the coin in the holder then it causes a bit more grief and calls for creative fixes like propping up the holder on one side.

Thanks again!
-Brandon

Hi Ray, I think the lighting looks really great, but can you also take a photo of the slitted black diffusers attached to the Jansjos? I can't get a feel for the exact construction from the reflection photo. Thanks!

The results are fantastic!

My 75ARD1 is supposed to arrive today!

When I got home from work today I had a package waiting for me at the front door. Of course, it was around 10 degrees outside and so I was worried about being too anxious about opening the package and not letting it adjust to the inside temperature. Inside the package was my 75mm/4.0 APO-Rodagon-D 1:1 lens.

I let the lens adjust to the inside temperature for around 1.5 hours, just to be certain that it didn't fog up or condense any moisture on the lens. While it was warming up, I was messing around with my set-up and assuring that the camera lens plane was parallel with the object plane of the coins I had been photographing. Needless to say, it was off (as I suspected), so I engineered a little wooden wedge piece and taped it up in electrical table for grip.

So, the process went:

1) Attach the 75ARD1 Lens to my bellows.

2) Assure that the planes were still parallel between my camera sensor and the copy stand using Ray's mirror method.

3) Adjust the white balance to the particular lens (I have found that not only can the light sources have a large effect on WB, but particular lenses can also have lesser but important effects -- my OCD forces me to reset the WB with each newly attached lens).

4) Find my trusty 1917 Wheatie, and shoot away.

The results, direct from the camera and resized to 800px square (obverse and reverse) and full size zoomed in shots (Lincoln's face and the date) are below. I did NO post-processing for color, contrast, sharpening, etc. I shot at f/8. The images speak for themselves, and I have to say, this lens lives up to EVERYTHING that people have said. It's a gem, and I hope everyone can snag one of these for < $300 like I did.

I didn't think you were lying, but I'm worried people will think I'm doctoring my photos or something because the dang lens is so crazy good. I've never felt like I needed to "unsharpen" a photo before.

Looks like you got a good copy of the lens. Given the description it should have been, but you never know. I've purchased a couple of these I had to send back due to haze, scratch and coatings problems. And one of the ones I bought just did not produce the same quality of image for some reason. But yours looks to produce a super sharp image across the whole field so you did not get unlucky...Ray

PS, on subject of sharpening, unless I am doing a shootout to compare lenses, I always do a sharpening of "1" at the final published size. I will occasionally sharpen at "1" prior to downsizing, but in general that does almost nothing to the image. No matter how sharp the lens, the camera will leave a bit of sharpness on the table, as do all the jpg conversion algorithms I've used. That final sharpening of "1" seems to just compensate for the sharpness lost in the conversion process.

That's about as pretty as it gets...Ray

PS I do see about 1/2-degree tilt clockwise on your reverse. The EPU is not quite level ;-)