Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Slabbing Lower Grade Classic Coins

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 2,969Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
matthewvincent's Avatar
United States
3486 Posts
 Posted 01/26/2012  5:37 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add matthewvincent to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
"I understand what your saying but it is hard to say a design that you can still see everyday in your pocket change as a classic"
---
Perhaps I should have used the word "iconic" instead of classic.

The "1909-S VDB" caught the imagination of people in 1909
and that has not changed a hundred year later. In the 60s even the most uninterested person could quote those words and knew that they were important. Both it and the 1914-d were heavily counterfeited. "Everyday" pocket change is not counterfeited.

Oh, the fact that the Wheat Reverse was discontinued fifty years ago at least makes these Lincoln Cent "half" classic.
I do not see "wheaties" everyday.

And the obverse? That was re-designed in 1969 at not a year too soon. It came out a lot prettier.

I did not say that all Lincoln Cents were classic. I said:

'... I consider these two to be "classic" and not modern.'

Two examples. Each of which having stood the test of time.
There should have been emphasis on the words, "these two."
Again, my mistake.

This is my explanation.
I'll be happy to answer any further questions on this matter.

Matthew


Edited by matthewvincent
01/26/2012 6:40 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 2,969Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to rattle this change. Forums