The slabbing is suspicious. The only identifier is "UNC" the words "guaranteed authentic" and a meaningless serial number. Hologram and bar code are suspiciously absent.
The coins are nice looking and don't seem over-graded. But, how could the Coin Manage software AND the seller both agree exactly upon the same figures? They MUST be getting these figures from somewhere. How did they both arrive at the valued figure, I wonder?
Seriously, I doubt those quarters are that valuable. I don't know what's going on here. I'll look them up in my 2007 RedBook:
1999D Connecticut quarter: MS65 is $2.
1999P Delaware quarter: MS65 is $3.
1957 MS67RD Penny THIS grade IS NOT LISTED. It does list MS65 valued at fifty cents.
Ok, that sounds a lot more like it. But it still doesn't answer my question entirely...where did those inflated values come from?
The coins are nice looking and don't seem over-graded. But, how could the Coin Manage software AND the seller both agree exactly upon the same figures? They MUST be getting these figures from somewhere. How did they both arrive at the valued figure, I wonder?
Seriously, I doubt those quarters are that valuable. I don't know what's going on here. I'll look them up in my 2007 RedBook:
1999D Connecticut quarter: MS65 is $2.
1999P Delaware quarter: MS65 is $3.
1957 MS67RD Penny THIS grade IS NOT LISTED. It does list MS65 valued at fifty cents.
Ok, that sounds a lot more like it. But it still doesn't answer my question entirely...where did those inflated values come from?




















