Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Did ANACS Make A Mistake Grading This 1922 No D ?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 24 / Views: 4,699Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
cipster's Avatar
United States
2362 Posts
 Posted 04/25/2012  8:18 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add cipster to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hi everyone,

Many of you have seen my 1922 No D Lincoln. It's graded as FS 401 Die 2 and XF40 by ANACS. The quick story is that I got it from my dad's pocket change in 1955 and threw it into a Maxwell House coffee can. It traveled with me for over fifty years until I finally had some time to look at the coins (knee surgery). ANACS says it is Die 2 FS 401 and graded at XF 40.

Honestly I am not interested in Lincolns because early 1800's half dollars and large cents are my area of interest. So, I put it up for sale on ebay.

A potential bidder is challenging the ANACS variety and grading saying that it is really a Die 3 Weak reverse. The critic sounds credible but of course it's ebay. When I posted the coin to this forum a while ago no one challenged the ANACS decision so I'm asking for everyone to take a closer look.

As usual I appreciate your expert opinions.

Did-ANACS-Make-A-Mistake-Grading-This-1922-No-D-?

Did-ANACS-Make-A-Mistake-Grading-This-1922-No-D-?

Did-ANACS-Make-A-Mistake-Grading-This-1922-No-D-?

Did-ANACS-Make-A-Mistake-Grading-This-1922-No-D-?
Member ANA and EAC

"You got to lose to know how to win".
Dream On by Aerosmith
Valued Member
Rigoletto's Avatar
United States
287 Posts
 Posted 04/25/2012  8:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Rigoletto to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't believe it is a die 3. The "o" in one is not spread out, BUT the reverse is weak. I can not tell from the pics what die it is. Here is a reference you can compare it with to check on it:

http://www.lincolncentresource.com/...rieties.html

Good luck!
Valued Member
Bluntedbobylon's Avatar
United States
247 Posts
 Posted 04/25/2012  11:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bluntedbobylon to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Based on the images via http://www.lincolncentresource.com/...rieties.html , it seems closer to die 3 but I honestly have no experience with these things so......not sure....
Pillar of the Community
paleoguy45's Avatar
United States
2936 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2012  06:59 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add paleoguy45 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I have a Die 2 No "D" and your coin is definitely not the same. The "Strong Reverse" is just that. Mine is a VF and not and XF with the wheat ends being very distinct and the stalk is sharp and thin. The obverse on these coins came from very worn dies and I can believe that yours is an "XF" based on that, albeit not the Die 2 variety.
Pillar of the Community
Moe145's Avatar
United States
8904 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2012  07:54 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Moe145 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It does appear to me to be a Die 3 coin. The spread of the left side of the O in ONE and the indistinct wheat ends (which one would expect to be pretty well defined on an XF40 coin) indicate that to me.

Edited by Moe145
04/26/2012 3:53 pm
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2012  09:22 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add just carl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'd have to say it is a weak reverse. Die 2 is supposed to be strong reverse. Hoever, if you selling it on ebay, I suppose someone will buy it based on the slabbed statement that it is authentic. So many fakes are out there that any real ones are worth buying. And as noted on that Lincoln Web site, many TPGS's don't distinquish between the different dies anyway.
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2012  10:20 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't know if it is die 3, but it is not die 2. So yes I would say that yes ANACS got it wrong.
Pillar of the Community
upstate's Avatar
United States
3283 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2012  12:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add upstate to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
With that grade, with a die 2, you would expect an equally strong reverse as
you have on the obverse. Hard to believe ANACS would make such a glaring (expensive) mistake.
Kind of crazy really.
Rest in Peace
johnny54321's Avatar
United States
4849 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2012  1:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add johnny54321 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree, die 3 or 1. It is definitely not a die 2. What a bummer, I don't know if ANACS can compensate for their mistake. Apparently you sent it in yourself, right? So there's no way it can be a fake or cracked out slab....
Pillar of the Community
D0ubl3Eagle's Avatar
United States
5854 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2012  3:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add D0ubl3Eagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Definitely not die pair 2. The wheat ears would show much more details in this grade. I am leaning towards die pair 3 on this one.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
cipster's Avatar
United States
2362 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2012  5:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cipster to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Apparently you sent it in yourself, right? So there's no way it can be a fake or cracked out slab....


First, thank you everyone for the feedback so far.

Yes, I sent it to ANACS myself so the holder has not been tampered with. It really makes me angry that I paid extra fees for them to research and identify the variety.

AND now is the time to start reading the ANACS warranty very carefully. It starts out really good as they will buy the coin or pay the difference between the actual grade and the incorrect grade. Oh but, "This Guarantee applies only to ANACS-certified platinum, gold and silver coins and excludes bronze, copper and copper-nickel coins".
Member ANA and EAC

"You got to lose to know how to win".
Dream On by Aerosmith
Valued Member
BuffaloBonehead's Avatar
United States
333 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2012  9:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add BuffaloBonehead to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well, the variety is at issue, not the grade. No harm in calling them up and explaining the situation.
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 04/26/2012  10:10 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Oh but, "This Guarantee applies only to ANACS-certified platinum, gold and silver coins and excludes bronze, copper and copper-nickel coins".

That only applies to the grading which is not in question. The problem is the ANACS does NOT guarantee attributions.


Quote:
ANACS' expertise is unmatched by any other grading service in regards varieties and attributions. However, attribution specialists and experts may sometimes disagree concerning any given variety or attributions. Also, some varieties are de-listed each year and others have their variety numbers and / or descriptions changed or modified. As a result, ANACS cannot guarantee any attribution or variety designation listed on an ANACS holder.


They do have something you can do if you think they blew the attribution... They say you can send it back in, pay the attribution fee again, and they will give it another try.


Quote:
If an ANACS customer has an ANACS-encapsulated coin that has had its variety or attribution listing changed or modified, the customer may, for a nominal fee, return the coin to ANACS so it can be updated.


You paid us to attribute it and we goofed, so pay us again and we'll give it another try.

Pillar of the Community
Moe145's Avatar
United States
8904 Posts
 Posted 04/27/2012  2:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Moe145 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
You paid us to attribute it and we goofed, so pay us again and we'll give it another try.



Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
cipster's Avatar
United States
2362 Posts
 Posted 04/29/2012  1:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cipster to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Just a quick update on this. I'll contact ANACS this week and let you know their response.

A friend who thinks it is a Die 2 suggested that maybe my cent was late die state and one of the last produced.

Does anyone know where I can find the # of coins produced after the reverse die broke and they replaced it with the stronger reverse? I thought it would be a small number and not enough to cause noticeable wear on the reverse but?
Member ANA and EAC

"You got to lose to know how to win".
Dream On by Aerosmith
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 04/30/2012  05:26 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
When the Die coins were made the obverse was already severely worn and the rev was new and sharp. For as weak as that rev is the obverse is much too strong. Unc Die 2's don't show THAT much detail on the obv.
  Previous TopicReplies: 24 / Views: 4,699Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.42 seconds to rattle this change. Forums