| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,220 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2223 Posts |
First complete missing date I've found. Has to be a 1993 or newer because it is a CAM ( or I suppose it could be a 92 CAM).  I was going to post this in the Contest Forum, "Guess the Date", but everyone would be a winner, or loser,  Is having date missing less desirous? I know you've seen em before, Enjoy!   
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 2223 Posts |
A reflection where the date should be caught my eye as I was putting this in a 2x2. Looks like its a 2000. It was hard getting a photo of it though. What do you think?  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
7096 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
594 Posts |
It does look like a 2000 there...good catch
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 2223 Posts |
 Yea, nearly fatal Quote: .good catch I'm going to have to remember to use lighting and reflection to pick up on things like this.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
That should be easy - 2000 is a one-year obverse type. I would need a good picture of the beard/bowtie area.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Is it a 2000 WAM? John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 2223 Posts |
Quote: 2000 is a one-year obverse type. I would need a good picture of the beard/bowtie area. Here's your beard/bowtie, hope they're good enough. Please explain the 2000 being a one-year obverse type. thanks   No, its a CAM.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7075 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Yup, definitely 2000. No question about it. The four little "fingerlets" of hair detail in the front of the throat are indicative of a 2000 cent. The lips are also indicative of the same. They look like a couple of little slugs glued onto Lincoln's face. 2000 was a hideous year for the obverse of the Lincoln Cent. I am glad it only lasted one year.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 2223 Posts |
Quote: Yup, definitely 2000 Thanks for the obverse identifiers for the 2000 Charles.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,220 |
|