| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 3,065 |
|
|
New Member
United States
4 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 to CCF. The 1970 is a large date. I can't tell on the other photos needs to be close up shots and more clear. On the 1991 what do you think is the error? John1 
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
On the 1991 the C and N in cent is doubled and also a few other letters in America which I show in the picture after it. Like I said I am new to this so any help is appreciated.
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
And thank you for the welcome John!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
808 Posts |
 I agree with John1, with the pics here I don't think the 1988 has the 1989 reverse, on the 1991 could be Machine Doubling. Clearer and closer pics would be a help !!  You at a great forum. There are many knowledgeable People here willing to help. They have helped me TONS . I still have trouble with the 1970-S Small/Large dates. 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
3039 Posts |
 RCC. The 1970 is a LD. The 1988 is probably not an RDV 006. Hard to tell. The 1991 is most likely Machine Doubling. Now that you're on the forum, you'll learn things quickly. Lots of good folks & info here. If you can spring for a digital microscope they really take great closeup pix and you'll be able to get lots of help with your coin questions.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2602 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2651 Posts |
The 70 is definitely a Large Date.
The 88- Although the pic of the designers initials are small. I think I see the serriff on the "G" which would make it the 89 Reverse. Again...with the picture it is hard to tell so to get a 100% accurate assessment closer pictures are needed.
1991-impossible to tell with the pictures provided.
So the only one I am 100% on is the Large Date.
A
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2624 Posts |
Ditto the  1970s large 1991 all I could make out was MD on the "C" in CENT 1988 really need a closer shot on the "FG" it looks like a possibility but can't enlarge it enough to be sure.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15509 Posts |
  with all the above. 70-S is for sure a Large Date. It would be helpful if you posted separate threads on each coin ... so we could better address your questions. David
Edited by nickelsearcher 05/30/2012 7:55 pm
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
Wow thank you every one for the replies! I agree Papatony there seems to be ALOT of people here who know what they are talking about. I will post some better pics of the 88/89 reverse. IT is hard with my digital camera lol.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
 70-S, LD, sadly.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 3,065 |
|