I agree with jw; If I had to choose between these two coins, I would buy the top coin, mainly because my Greek collection (such as it is) has a geographic focus, and the top coin has a nice clear city-name (KALLATIA). The second coin is a coin of one of the Achaean League cities; all League cities issued coins with much the same design with the distinctive "AX" monogram as the central motif. This similarity makes League coinage both a rather "boring" series to collect and more difficult to identify, since the city-identifier is usually just a monogram or a couple of letters (in this case, I believe there's some kind of "AI" monogram above, and "EY" below, with some weird pictoglyphs on either side which I can't identify).
But I suspect the answer is that the second one costs more. And the reason for this may simply be availability on the market; irrespective of the absolute rarity of the two coins, the first coin is from a city in what is now Romania; whereas the League cities were all in what is now mainland Greece.
But I suspect the answer is that the second one costs more. And the reason for this may simply be availability on the market; irrespective of the absolute rarity of the two coins, the first coin is from a city in what is now Romania; whereas the League cities were all in what is now mainland Greece.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis






















