| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 5,131 |
|
Valued Member
Canada
306 Posts |
The old (pre security) Loonies in circulation always seem to be heavily tarnished after just two or three years in normal circulation.  Does anyone have any idea if this has been improved with the new version of these coins?
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3692 Posts |
The new ones are quite bad. I'm already seeing new loonies that look like old 1987 loonies.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
372 Posts |
I got a new $2 for change yesturday.Same thing,it looks like it has been circulated for at least a couple of years.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
135 Posts |
Yes I see these coins being less durable.
Coatings or thin plating over a steel or zinc core does not make a durable finish for something like a coin. They are cheap.
I can't help but wonder if it is wise to save the "good" example of these crappy coins for future collector value.
Their lake of quality will mean they will either be pulled from circulation earlier, or self destruct.
I have found five year old coins in my gravel driveway that are 50% disintegrated, half moon shaped.
The American "Zincolns" seem to be made slightly better, and hold up better underground. (My opinion from metal detecting experiences.)
It's ironic when the point of converting your currency from bills to coins was to save money on replacing money that wears out.
Edited by Sixthcents 07/22/2012 10:40 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
I have seen many new loonies stained and tarnished very badly. Even the fist ones I saved in my 2x2s have started to very lightly tarnish. I though the point of these new ones, aside from the higher security was to make them last longer, just like the polymer bills.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2781 Posts |
the cheap factor has a phsycological effect aswell. way back in the day coins had weight, quality and character, and in your hand you could 'feel' the value. the new stuff just feels 'cheap'. the new pennies are more pink than 'copper' and feel like a kids tiddlee-wink chip or a plastic bingo marker, the new loonies are so bright yellow out of the roll you can spot them from across the room (not a good tone of yellow either, its kind of hard on the eyes - IMO).
dont even get me started on the twoonies... the rims are so badly formed it looks like they were made with a hammer and anvil...
i realize these are an massively mass produced item but come on, even the chinese counterfieters would make better quality.
and how can the mint expect other nations to contract their coins to us when we put out such crap?
take some pride for crying out loud (sorry - rant /off)
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
135 Posts |
I too think they look pink, that`s what I look for when picking them out from the copper. The new Loonies have a green pee colour lol.
I also agree with them sounding cheap, the just don`t have that "ting"
|
|
New Member
Canada
8 Posts |
I have a couple of the new loonies and twoonies that I have have placede in 2x2's they all have black marks that where not there when I placed them in, and now every one I get in my change seems to be tarnished, hope they get rid of them soon.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3692 Posts |
I just saw on the RCM website that the new loonies are brass-plated over steel as opposed to bronze-plated over nickel in the past. Brass is pretty disgusting when it gets handled enough. It starts to turn brown and black and makes anything that touches it turn green. Ew.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
306 Posts |
If brass is that bad, why don't they just use bronze plating over steel then?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Germany
992 Posts |
Quote: If brass is that bad, why don't they just use bronze plating over steel then? Generally speaking, brass is cheaper.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
306 Posts |
I understand somewhat if the mint is trying to make less valuable coins like the nickels cheaper to make, but seriously, the loonie and toonie are worth WAY more in face value than they cost to make already. Would it kill the mint to make our larger denomination coins out of nicer metals and better quality? Even if it costs more to make them, they are worth more in circulation. A less than 1 year old loonie shouldn't look worse than a 20+ year old nickel! Our newer quarters and nickels are plated steel and they seem to stand up very well so making a plated coin stand up doesn't seem to be impossible.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
135 Posts |
I agree we should have some nicer quality, high dollar coin. Maybe even a $20 silver coin that has a little less then $20 in silver content.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3692 Posts |
They should look into revamping all coins into silver-plated at least. The steel quarters: I've already seen rusted examples of quarters that have sat out in the rain and elements and to be honest I thought they were slugs before I picked them up.
FYI: /most/ brass is 88% CU and 12% Zn. There are MANY alloy variations out there for different applications. There's a magazine dedicated to brass. I'll try to get the name later on.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
306 Posts |
The $20 silver coin idea wouldn't work unless it had way less than $20 of silver in it because of the volatile price of silver. If the price of silver jumped, a lot of coins would be lost to melting. Also, I don't think too many people want a $20 circulating coin to begin with.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
135 Posts |
I know what you mean, but there is nothing wrong with that in theory. You WANT people to desire your money. If your $20 coin goes up in value, great, your "dollar" just became stronger.
When individual earns, our invests in this currency, they should be able to do what they please with it. You want to burn a $100 bill, you should be able to do so, although people will look at you funny. (It's illegal though these days to burn a federal note etc, which is just a tool for transactions, rather actual money. Same thing as a Debit card.)
Liquidating silver by melting is just one of many ways to trade, the metal is not destroyed.
The federal reserve is supposed to have their own silver, etc from taxes etc.
The cost of re-manufacturing coins would be less then it is now, because they don't have to spend on disposable coins like zinc and steel.
Part of the problem of having people "scoop" up silver coins is, you have two bordering countries (USA and Canada)with money of similar shape and character. The currencies get mixed up and yes would leak money to other countries that way.
Isolate the currency by shape. Make it a thicker coin, or square/rectangle etc. That will help keep it from getting deposited in a foreign countries daily money stream.
If someone finds some foreign silver on their land, good for them. They can take it a do as they wish with it.
The idea is to have foreign funds enter your country, through direct purchase of your silver. We don't want to loose it in pocket change as we have in the past.
If we need to easy the transition to silver, we could make a bi-metal coin like the Toonie.
Think how nice a slug of silver surrounded by a ring of copper would be for a $20 coin.
I drool over the though of a Gold-Titanium alloyed $100 coin. AuTi. The same technology is used in Dentistry. I think it's around 90% gold, 10% titanium.
Or stick to a more traditional scheme with a solid Copper $20, Silver $50 and a solid Gold $1000.
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 5,131 |