| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 3,245 |
|
Valued Member
United States
349 Posts |
I picked one up from my coin dealer today for $6 dollars. My first silver clad Kennedy.
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
620 Posts |
Good for you I completed my Kenedy set a few years ago.
Stopped the set in 2010 P.D.S. and ss
Great set to build, good luck
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
I've found those a bit irritating trying to get a decent variety of dates. From most rolls I find mostly bicentennials and 1971's.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
56 Posts |
Congratulations on your first Kennedy . The set when completed looks real impressive when you have displayed in a nice album. Good luck searching for the rest.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
349 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Egypt
3470 Posts |
Congratulations, I have completed a 1964-85 set and it really looks great. I am now working on the other set 1986-present. It is really a beautiful set.
Wish you the best of luck with the remaining coins.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
86 Posts |
What is the difference between the 1979S type 1 and type 2 proofs? I see in the Red Book "Filled S" and "Clear S" but I'm not sure what that means... Can somebody point me to photos of the differences? thanks |
|
Valued Member
United States
300 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
56 Posts |
Congratulations on your venture into the beautiful world of collecting the Kennedy's. You will be surprised to see how good they look once completed and in a nice looking folder.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
86 Posts |
Night Hawk
good web site. Thanks
|
|
Valued Member
United States
141 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
20 Posts |
Well that's good to hear; but I insisted on using the 1970-D Kennedy in my year set - and actually found one that had been inadvertently placed in circulation on ebay (even the seller listed it as "circulated;" it turned out to be like AU-55). |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
815 Posts |
I have been having trouble really getting concrete info on which JFK halfs are silver, and which do not. You yanks make it confusing by using the term "clad" to mean two different things! For the 1970, there is an S, and a D right? Are both silver? I have an S that I bought that appears to be proof or at the very least BU, and it passed the " tissue test". I have heard the 1970D is the key date in the series, why is this? Is it silver? Was it a small mintage? |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
1970D- 40% silver clad, Mint Set-only mintage 2.15M
1970S- 40% silver clad, Proof-only mintage 2.63M
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
The 1970-D half is the key because of it's low mintage, and the mintage was low because they were only included in the 1970 mint set. None were made for circulation. As for which Kennedy halves are silver 90% silver 1964 and D business strikes and 1964 proof 1992-S to 2012-S silver proofs (There are also coppernickel clad proofs for all these years as well.) 1998-S matte proof from the Robert F Kennedy commemorative set. 40% silver 1965-67, 1968-D,69-D,and 70-D business strikes. 1976-S business strikes 1968-S to 70-S proofs. Some of the 1976-S proofs (the 76-S proof also comes as a coppernickel clad issue) I think that is all the silver Kennedys |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3755 Posts |
The reason the term clad is used for regular and silver Kennedys is that the 40% silver coins from 65-70 were clad with silver. I do not remember the precise percentages, but the core of the coins is a low percentage of silver that is clad in a higher percentage layer of silver all equaling out to 40% silver. Therefor people tend to call the 40 percenters silver clad. Its a non homogenous coin. (I used a big boy word there!)  |
| |
Replies: 20 / Views: 3,245 |
Posted 08/25/2012 6:01 pm
