Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

A Difference In Thickness?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 2,246Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
cladking's Avatar
United States
2271 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2007  12:01 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cladking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The coating on the zinc is just about as thin as it can be and still cover the core.

Again, coin thickness varies from year to year based on striking characteristics. This can vary dramatically from year to year. There is even a little variation within a year and in the last few years there has been some variation between mints.

The only significant change in recent times was a 1% reduction in strip thickness for 1999 and later quarters. This was within tolerance for weigh and they might have puched the blank slightly larger to compensate for the weight discrepancy though this information is not yet available.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
Valued Member
Joeyuk's Avatar
United States
383 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2007  2:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Joeyuk to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't think I even use these once a month but there nice to have around.
A micrometer and scale.
A-Difference-In-Thickness?

I saw no real appreciable difference between the 1982 BU copper cents I have and the Zincolns I compared them to. There was alot of variation within the same coin around the rim, but nothing consistant from the copper cents to the zinc.
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2007  3:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add errorfinder to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I've noticed since 1982 with the 'zinc ' introduction thinner cents.it interested me, because after re-rolling searched rolls i'd have to add a cent to get the count right ,;according to the a hand held; roll coin counter I was using,. well after some double and triple checking it was and is indeed to the stack height difference.which is how the counter works "stack height "a roll of post '82 uncirulated cents will be shorter than say a roll from '81. by one cents thickness in a 50 'stack' count stack.now some math;say, I've searched approximately 600,000 (post 1982)thousand cents divide by 50 (per roll)12,000 rolls. at one cent per roll loss it would have cost me $120.00 .. P.S. i'am glad I noticed cause using a hand held counter allows me to easily /and speedily re-roll empty (rolls).just have better things to do than give the bank "more" of my money.when I un-roll coins, I do so carefully; as not to tear the 'bank rolls' so I can reuse them.
Valued Member
yavaris's Avatar
United States
169 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2007  3:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add yavaris to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
errorfinder... I can't even imagine going through that many cents :)...I hope you found some awesome errors, haha.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2007  7:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add just carl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm a rather pesimist when it comes to our government release of statistics. That being said I highly doubt that there is a great quality control at our Mint varifying the thickness and composition of the matalic sheets they make our coins from. You must remember they do not make the metalic sheets, they buy them and any organization that is famous for paying hundreds of dollars for a hammer just can't be trusted. I've weighed numerous brand new cents over the years with a few scales that are accurate to 0.001 Grams and have a problem aquiring that famous exact government released weight of 3.11 Grams per cent. I'm sure the thickness as well as the weight varies and they don't care. Even if you could prove that numerous cents are different from what they say, what are you going to do about it and they no there is nothing you can do. If the cents came out ten times normal size, the mint would just say your in need of glasses. Especially ones with Martinis in them.
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 03/17/2007  9:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes the coins vary and "thickness" is a function of the striking pressure. The greater the striking pressure the thicker the coin and the taller the stack. But since 2002 the striking speed has increased greatly which has meant lower relief and with it lower rims because there was less time for the dies to fill, which once again can result in thinner coins
  Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 2,246Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to rattle this change. Forums