| Author |
Replies: 53 / Views: 4,498 |
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Edit: The grades are in. There are some real surprises, both good and bad. I'm bumping this to the top for any last guesses before the reveal. For the record, the only grades revealed will be those the owner has specifically given permission for.I have organized a joint submission to PCGS with a few Coin Community members. There will be an interesting cross-section of US coinage in this submission, and it seems like an ideal time to try your grading skills against those of PCGS, over a variety of types. Below I will be posting my best images of the coins submitted. There will be additional posts, as I receive coins from the other participants and image them. Please share your grade opinions of one or all of them. We'll start with a couple from Tights24, an 1830 Bust Half and an 1886 Morgan dollar. Tights24 was concerned that his Morgan would not qualify as Prooflike; holding this coin in hand, I will say that I'll be astonished if it does not. The coin was a bear to image, it's so bright. I still haven't got the reverse right. The Bust half might be a tad bright, but the colors are authentic. 1886 Morgan dollar:   1830 Bust Half:   Next, from nohope587, we have two of his beloved Two Cents. 1864 Two Cents:   1865 Two Cents:   More to come.
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4589 Posts |
the Morgan I say is beautiful, But to much chatter on the obverse I say MS-63PL next the bust half EF-Au. The 1864 Two Cent gorgeous I say MS-64 looks like a sharp strike for the series and the 1865 Two Cent Maybe MS-63 but I think more like a MS-62 I tried to grade these with out my book, I hope I did well
Edited by scoutjim99 03/20/2007 11:29 pm
|
|
Forum Mom
 United States
5877 Posts |
This is a great idea, Dave!  Here are my opinions: 1886 Morgan - MS63PL - too much cheek chatter for 64 1830 Bust Half - VF25 1864 Two Cents - AU55 BN 1865 Two Cents - EF45 Can't wait to see some more! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
675 Posts |
I think MS-63 PL for the Morgan VF-35 for the Bustie..
Not even going to try the 2 cent pieces, I have very little knowledge on that series!
Nice coins guys!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
140 Posts |
ms-63 PL for the morgan EF-40 for the bust half au-55 for the first 2 cent ef-45 for the second 2cent
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2254 Posts |
As far as the pictures.......   When you are done with everyone elses coins that are going in for this group, please put your camera in the settings you used for the PL pics, put into a padded box, and mail to me. Feel free to insure it. I have some extra GW dollars to trade for it, and they have no errors!!! In checking ebay, the no error coins may be the rarity!!  Thanks again for all of the work you are putting in.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
Dave is the obverse rim on the morgan really that thin ?
MS-62 PL is a possible its hard to judge the depth of the fields in a picture,, I think the rim bumps on the reverse will hold the coin back a grade.
I have been fooled by the strike on the 2 cent coins before ,so I'm going to the high side on the 1864 and saying the coin is MS-63BRN.
The 1865 is also an MS-63 BRN.
The 2 cent coins are a real trick ,, and I have little experiance with them ,, I guess this as good a way to be wrong as any .
Thanks Dave ,,this is a good Idea !
Metalman
The bust half is a strong VF-35 and I would not be surprised to see it slab at an EF-40 by market standards.
|
|
Forum Mom
 United States
5877 Posts |
Sorry, I still maintain that the Bust half is VF25. Just a little too much wear on the brow, hair, and clasp for higher. Unfortunately, that does not mean that PCGS will see it that way, but that's what I would grade it to sell. I am very curious as to what grade it will bring. I think ANACS would grade it the same way I did, but I don't know about PCGS. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
819 Posts |
great idea for this thread, I will postpone decisions until I can check my reference material at home; but I agree with Tights, I want your camera. If you can't send it, can you advise of any special technique(s), etc that you may have used? I am borrowing a camera today and will try to take some pics tonight using a copystand...but I am envious of your skills (and coins too!).
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23522 Posts |
I'm going to repost my camera setup, in response to the comments and so that you'll understand that it's not as complex or exacting as you think to get quality coin pics. Here's the whole rig:  That space doubles as my PC repair station (I'm a freelance PC tech on the side), so I have to put everything up and take it down every time I shoot coins. Every picture you see me post of a coin comes from that setup. Here are the important aspects: The camera is a Canon Digital Rebel XT, with a Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro lens. If I am to credit anything with the quality of my pics, it is this truly amazing lens. From the day I took the first picture with this camera, Canon became my only recommendation for a camera to image coins, if only so you can use this wonderful glass. For lighting, I am using a 48" track light, with as many as 3 of those dangling gooseneck lamps. They hold 50w MR16 halogen bulbs, the smallest-diameter bulbs able to throw that much light, so I can get them as close to vertical as I can over the coin. Usually they are actually touching the barrel of the lens, or infringing on its' field of view, when I shoot a coin. I've wired them in with a dimmer, but I don't use it much since it screws up the white balance. The little table lamp at the side is only used for side-lighting to highlight die cracks and such. That's all it takes. Cheap lights, placed properly, and a great lens. The little white wire coming from the camera is an optional, but really helpful, addition to the process. It's a tether to my computer, where I'm using software called DSLR Remote Pro to do the actual picture-taking. With it, I can set aperture, exposure and ISO from the keyboard, and I use the left mouse button to release the shutter. That way, once I get the camera initially set up, I don't have to touch it again. I can vary settings as fast as I can click the mouse. It has a Preview function, so I can see on my monitor what the shot will look like without actually snapping it. The picture is written directly to my hard drive, without using the camera's memory card. That leads to another important point. Using Tights24's Morgan as an example, I have a total of 15 shots saved, totaling 60MB worth of pictures. I only saved about a third of the shots I took, and I only took about half the shots I Previewed. Of course, this was an extreme example, since I have difficulty getting realistic pics of lustrous silver with my lighting. The Two Cents only required a few tries; I have three of each face saved. This lens has a real sweet spot for coins between f/8.0 and f/14; I tend to stay in that zone and vary ISO and exposure to get the look I want. Settings vary from about ISO 100, 1/200 @ f/12 for the Morgan to ISO 400, 1/125 @ f/8.0 for the Two Cents. The narrow aperture setting is why I have to use 150w worth of light. If I went to something wider than f/5.0, which I've done, I get a lesser depth of field that lets me shoot really sharp coins with really nice fields. Unfortunately, the pictures are bogus because the narrow depth of field blurs the fields of the coin, disguising their flaws, when I have the devices in sharp focus. Tights24 in particular pays the price for this greater depth of field; both of his coins are far nicer in hand than my pictures indicate.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2335 Posts |
I'm lost on Morgans once they get above AU, but I'm going to call it a MS-63PL. Maybe ya'll are seeing something I'm not, but the bust half looks like a VF-30 choice to me. The 1864 2 cent is a tough one, but I'll go MS-60. I think there is a little too much wear on the 1865 to get an AU, but it looks better than an EF-45, can I call it an EF-49? Then again, I'm really new to grading, so I wouldn't be surprised to find out I'm way off on all of them.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1267 Posts |
Great idea, SuperDave! I'll agree with the ms63 on the Morgan, PL if the mirrors are deep enough. The Bust I will guess VF-30 The 2-cent pieces I have very little experience with, but I will assume they are weakly struck and I'll guess ms62 for the 1864 and ms63 for the 1865. Cool thread! 
|
|
New Member
United States
5 Posts |
SuperDave,
Those are really cool pictures. Do you mind if I use them in wikipedia?
I asked Tights24 (I work with him) and he did not care.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23522 Posts |
quote: SuperDave,
Those are really cool pictures. Do you mind if I use them in wikipedia?
I asked Tights24 (I work with him) and he did not care.
Welcome to Coin Community. Which wiki entry do you desire the images for? I am not sure whether I can actually give you permission to use them. Although I personally do not object, having been posted here they are the property of the website owner under most usage agreements. Furthermore, the coins depicted in this thread do not belong to me, and are only posted here with the express permission of their owners. I think a reading from Bobby and Susan, the owners of the site, is in order. I'll contact them. If they have no objections to your use of images I have created which are hosted here, then you have my permission to use them, pending the approval of the owners of the individual coins. A few examples from my collection are posted here, as well: http://www.coincommunity.org/galler...hp?album=510Of course, you'll want to put them on another server rather than hotlinking.
|
|
New Member
United States
5 Posts |
I would guess that you as the photographer have the copyright of the photo.
also the disclaimer below "Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited."
I think that you are the original artist and Tights24 is the owner on the image. Tights24 verbally told me he did not care.
The entry in wikipedia is missing for busted cap and I wanted to write an article and have a good picture.
You take GREAT coin pictures.
|
|
New Member
United States
5 Posts |
I did some research and images of coins are not copyrightable and all images of coins are in the public domain.
"This image depicts a unit of currency issued by the United States of America. It is solely a work of the United States Government, is ineligible for copyright, and is therefore in the public domain"
|
| |
Replies: 53 / Views: 4,498 |