This coins details may be weak due to a weak strike. If you look at the rim of the obverse, you will see no wear, the denticles are still well defined and some details of the stars are still present. Evidence of a weak strike can be found on the reverse, where it looks to have been misaligned during the strike or a bad planchet as shown by the rim lacking denticles and detail from 12-2 o'clock positions. There is also very little wear, if only slight rubbing, on the face.
Having only pcgs photograde as a basis of comparison at the moment, this coin certainly blows away the VF35 example, and, dare I say, the XF40 example. There is too much detail, luster and a lack of contact marks to be any lower than XF40. I might revise up to XF45 with an off chance at AU50 if strike weakness is considered.
Edited by EFLargeCents
02/05/2013 2:56 pm