| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 6,040 |
|
New Member
Yemen
42 Posts |
Well I have no idea what could have been a better subject, One of the coins I bought has this reading: SPERAVI 1755 X IN TE DOMINE, and on the other side: FRANCD GRISA GEIERRLOBMHD. ( with the portrait of an old man with long hair)
Anyone has any idea what it can be?
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
6563 Posts |
All I know so far is it read "In the Year of Our Lord 1755" but my latin is a bit rusty. Sap should be able to give you the entire history of this coin. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2254 Posts |
My gut feeling is Portugal, but the GEIERR part confuses me. I can't seem to get anywhere with that. Maybe it's a token or medal of some type. I agree with Grace, Sap is the man for this one.
Edited by tights24 04/23/2007 7:47 pm
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16826 Posts |
I'm at work (without my books) this morning, but I can say that's most likely an Austrian coin. RISA is short for Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire. The emperor in 1755 was Francis I - the WIkipedia page has a picture of a coin issued in his name from Regensburg, Bavaria. I'd guess GEIERRLOBMHD would be GE IER R LO B M H D (King of Germany and Jerusalem, Duke of Lombardy, Burgundy (or Bohemia?) and a few other places). The 1700's Krause has an index of latin mottoes and their translations. I'll look it up when I get home tonight. What's the reverse design? Eagle with coat of arms? Any numbers or anything else to give a denomination? Diameter and metal? With a bit more information, we can ID this one properly, but if you bought it in Yemen, it's most likely a thaler. Austrian thalers were a popular trade coin in that part of the world.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
New Member
 Yemen
42 Posts |
The reverse design, has a two none facing heads of eagles with their tounges out, with a small cross between them, and a shield in the middle, then at the bottom, two hands each holding a different looking sword, with feathers on both sides, with a small "K" at the beginning of the "SPERAVI 1755 X IN TE DOMINE" and a small "B" at the end of it.
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16826 Posts |
OK, I think that narrows it down. It appears you have a half-thaler of Austria, Emperor Francis I, 1755, KB mintmark (KM# 2036). CV for a Fine specimen is $65, VF $100, EF $185. We'd need to see an actual picture of yours to guess the grade. You pointed out the "small cross" between the two eagle-heads - that's actually attached to the crown, but it's really only visible on the half-thalers. It's present on the full thaler too, but it gets lost in the neck-feathers. You might want to double-check the dimensions of your coin. If it weighs about 14 grams and is about 33mm across, it's a half thaler. If it's 40mm diameter and 28.8 grams weight, it's a thaler. If it weighs something radically different to either figure, it might be a fake. To demonstrate the difference between a half thaler and thaler, here are some pics I found on CoinArchives:  The above coin is a full thaler, 1755, mintmark HA. See how the cross on top of the crown is barely visible between the bird's necks.  This next coin is a half thaler; the monarch is different (Maria Theresa, not Francis I) but the reverse is probably the same as yours; note the cross between the eagle's heads is much more prominent. The "KB" mintmarks on your coin are for the Kremnitz mint, located in what is now Hungary. Krause translates IN TE DOMINE SPERAVI as "In Thee, O Christ, have I hoped". The motto was used on coinage of Austria, Tuscany and Lorraine.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
New Member
 Yemen
42 Posts |
Thank you Sap Unfortunately I am not able to post the pictures, but I will as soon as possible, unless I retire soon from this hobby as it is as exciting as hectic for me, as I do not have professional help around, but this forum has been giving me a real support.
The first side of the coin is exactly like the one you have posted but the reverse, it shows the small cross in the exact place and size like the second coin you have posted, and the "K" and "B", they are not in the same positions like in your picture neither the wording. Again I guess I have a fake and a real bad one.
Hope soon I will be able to post the pictures and then you can assist me more.
Thank you very much
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Germany
1238 Posts |
Amazing "detective" work, Sap! Thanks for the story and the images. Just one (fairly peripheral ...) comment: Kremnitz/Kremnica (and the mint http://www.mint.sk/) is in Slovakia. Christian
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16826 Posts |
quote: Kremnitz/Kremnica (and the mint http://www.mint.sk/) is in Slovakia.
The list of Austrian mints in the 17th century Krause puts Kremnitz in Hungary. I suppose it was technically in Hungary at the time, but it sure isn't anymore. It didn't sound quite right when I wrote it, but I didn't double check my facts. My bad.  
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
New Member
 Yemen
42 Posts |
Thx all for your replies, and sap, I am more then grateful to you, please check out the pictures of the coin in subject Image: Francdgrisa1.jpg33.29 KB Image: Francdgrisa2.jpg89.72 KB
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16826 Posts |
I don't really see anything wrong with that one, authenticity-wise. The position of the mintmarks is different to most of those pictured, but I don't know how important that is for this series. It does seem to have been mounted at some stage, with those marks above the emperor's head, and below his chin. That will reduce the grade, and value.
I still can't be sure which denomination it is. How big is it? It doesn't actually make much difference to the value; with the wear and mount-marks, I'd only grade it Very Good, and both the thalers and half-thalers catalogue at around US$30 to US$40 in that condition.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
New Member
 Yemen
42 Posts |
I cannot be more grateful to all of you, Specially Sap. After receiving Your previous post with the picture of the half thaler, I went back to the market and took these pictures of a similar one, but not in a good condition, would you mind evaluating it for me, should I buy it? Image: Austria 1755-2.jpg92.01 KB Image: Austria 1755-1.jpg90.55 KB
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16826 Posts |
That one looks fair enough to me, too. I'd grade it Fine, CV $110 in my book. These coins don't have mintmarks in the conventional sense; the small shield right in the middle of the larger shield is the effective mintmark. This coin is Vienna mint, the only mint listed for this type in 1755.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
New Member
 Yemen
42 Posts |
Thank you very much Sap, and all who have replied, You have made my day, the first genuine I have discovered. If it is ok with you I have some more. And if I am abusing your expertise please let me know. Thank you Image: autrian 1812-1.jpg85.95 KB Image: autrian 1812-2.jpg90.33 KB
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16826 Posts |
Ah, another thaler, 1821V, KM#2162, CV proabbly $40 to $50 in that condition - maybe less. It's quite worn (either Good or Very Good condition?) and then there are those lines across the portrait side from top to bottom. The "V" mintmark below the head is for Venice, the city now in Italy, and is slightly scarcer than coins of the larger Austrian mints.
I must say, I'm a bit more skeptical about the authenticity of this one. The colour looks a bit greenish, and it looks... fuzzy... in places where it shouldn't. It could have been buried or something else strange happen to it, I suppose. I'd want to check the weight on this one.
Please understand I'm by no means the last word in establishing genuineness or fakeness of these coins. I'm just making an educated guess, based on photographs. You have the coins in hand, so you're in a better position to judge than I am. If at all possible, get a balance or scales that can weigh to 0.01 gram accuracy - you'll find it a most valued tool to check authenticity of a coin. They even make portable ones you can take with you when you go coin shopping, though I'm not sure using one would be considered a polite thing to do in your culture.
The right weight doesn't mean it's real, but the wrong weight certainly means it's fake. This coin, for instance, should weigh 28.06 grams when newly struck - the standard weight of a thaler. Even a very worn example like that one shouldn't lose more than a few percent of it's mass.
Finally, consider the source. If you find someone selling fakes (like those Chinese dollars), then any other coins they sell are suspicious, too, even if they look all right. Guilt by association.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
3831 Posts |
Sap, I would disagree with the first coin. Have you seen the huge amount of counterfeits popping out on ebay these days by Chinese sellers?
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 6,040 |