SsuperDdave,
I just located your "What is a
VAM" article and pasted one of your paragraphs below.
After reading your article, I now understand that die clashes don't make a
VAM of itself, but can be added as a subvariety to a listed
VAM, and also realize how much time was wasted on taking all those photos of die scratches on the 1878CC Morgan in the other thread, and assume they can be markers for this (1878cc) coin being struck with a late stage reverse die.
[paragraph copied from SsuperDdave's "What is a
VAM" CCF article]
""Very few VAMs have characteristics which are so obvious they can be seen with the naked eye. The overwhelming majority are identified through minute doubling of features or die damage-related markers. So, in most cases, attributing a
VAM is a process requiring a loupe with minimum 15x magnification. It should be noted that in most cases, die cracks and clashing artifacts are not of themselves sufficient to warrant
VAM designation, although they can qualify as a subvariety - for instance, if VAM-1 is identified, a clashed version of the same coin can be designated VAM-1A.""
☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼ ☼
Since my VAM-6 also has a die clash not listed in the VAM-6 listing, wouldn't it qualify for a subvariety as VAM-6A ?
Also, Who makes the final decision on listing a new
VAM, and who would one contact should they locate what could be a new
VAM?