NGC Bad Business: Black Core/Retro Holder For Mcm 2013 ASE

Like I've stated: My main concern is the business practice of TPG in general and specifically NGC in this case. If they can't keep their own word, change/do whatever they want regardless of collectors/buyer concern (same as US Mint regarding the 2012-S ASE) then should we continue to trust them?

I don't really what they put on the market (I don't care about ER/FS when consider buying the coin), as long as they stick to their gun and keep their word.

Btw, I have to agree with baseball21. Some care about the extra/fancy stuff, some just want plain vanilla. Diversity is good for the market BUT inconsistency is BAD.

I like how labels drive people nuts, I've been collecting some older moderns and not to long ago slab labels used to be pretty darn basic. It's pretty well known that corporations do whatever they want, within the law, and otherwise, but certainly enough, lying, or going back on your word is not against the law either, unless someone decides to sue for damages incurred as a result, which is common as well.

NGC sent an email a couple weeks ago with details on submitting WP 2 coin sets. They mentioned that the black holder was back for this set by popular demand.

Your average person just buys the slab. I see auctions all the time on ebay with badly spotted SAEs going for more than clean coins because they have a desired label.