| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,885 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1094 Posts |
Here is another one I got graded the other day. What do you think?  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
AU53 is my guess it looks to have a fair amount of luster the reverse carries this coin. Maybe details, "cleaned" from the light hairlines I'm also picking up on the obverse? My gut feeling was AU50 - but I think there is enough luster to bump it up to 53.
I don't see any rim hit brenpickle, maybe you are see the holder edge?
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
Edited by westcoin 07/23/2013 8:00 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3486 Posts |
I say XF45 to AU50 due to the weak forehead hair. This date and mint is not known for a weak strike.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
836 Posts |
I say AU50 and might have detailed due to the rim hit.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
274 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Israel
2420 Posts |
Somewhere between 45 and 50. I'll bet ANACS gave it the AU50.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
972 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1745 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36688 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18649 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
286 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
274 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,885 |