| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,750 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2850 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Those are die cracks. Morgan dollars, throughout their mintage, were at all times produced at the absolute maximum of the capacity of both the machinery and the hardware involved in their production. The dies used to mint them were by nature pushed past their physical limits, and the cracks you've illustrated in your images is proof.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2850 Posts |
Thanks, Dave. So in other words they are relatively common? I'm more of a modern coin/LMC type of guy so haven't really gotten my feet wet in this topic yet. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1511 Posts |
SsuperDdave Summed it up perfectly.. As always..  As for value, it really depends on which VAM it is, which from die cracks alone we will not be able to tell. Check out Vamworld for 1904 VAMs (narrow it down by mint mark, which you haven't told us and no pics show) and try to match yours up. Or post full obverse and reverse pics here and we'll try to help you out.. Die cracks on Morgans are common, but depending on which VAM it is it may not be. Some VAMs are exceedingly rare, while most are quite common. I don't know near the amount about them as Dave so I can't tell you if there are any super value VAMs out of the 1904's or if there are any conditional rarities... My 1904-O has the same cracks around the date, I don't remember the rest off hand.. But I haven't gotten around to VAMing it yet..
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
As common as die cracks are, they aren't used as qualification for a given VAM, but more as attribution aids. Cracks are line fingerprints - to two are completely alike - and they can be great help in attributing especially circulated coins on which the usual identifying characteristics have worn away. On your coin, the shape of the cracks over the A in AMERICA and at the date are rather unusual and would be a great confirmation for whatever VAM your coin is. Unfortunately, I couldn't find those cracks shown on any 1904 VAMs for which the data exists. Data for 1904 is slim, especially the Philadelphia coins.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2850 Posts |
Dave,
I just realized I forgot to mention that this 1904 Morgan has an O mintmark. I briefly looked on Vamworld, but I really have no idea what I'm looking at. If any more photos are needed for identification I'll try my best to get some.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
A picture of the mint mark to determine position and a good picture of the date to identify any doubling of the date digits would be a good start. I believe your Morgan is a die pair that does not have full plate photos or a later die state of one that does.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: I believe your Morgan is a die pair that does not have full plate photos or a later die state of one that does. Yeah, agreed - I looked at every single 1904 plate photo on VAMworld for this thread.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Quote: Yeah, agreed - I looked at every single 1904 plate photo on VAMworld for this thread Same here.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: Same here You realize this conclusively proves we're both (like all VAMmers) nuts, right? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2850 Posts |
Alright here's a couple more photos. I hope these will help some.  
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Quote: You realize this conclusively proves we're both (like all VAMmers) nuts, right? Agreed..  I enjoy hunting through VAM listings to help someone else as much as I enjoy it for myself! This is nuts (in a good sense of the term), right? edit to add - I think this would be considered right edge of normal date position and mint mark tilted slightly left.
Edited by dave700x 08/31/2013 8:37 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
220 Posts |
You have either a VAM-36, or VAM-36A. My guess would be a VAM-36 since it is a LDS of that die pair.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
220 Posts |
I guess I should expound a little. The coin you have is a late die state of the VAM-36 die pair marriage. The distinctive cracks nail the attribution. But Dave is right, the cracks do NOT make the VAM. The cracks only assist in attribution. The early die state (VAM-36A) was listed for the denticle impressions around the arrow heads on the reverse. As the dies wore from production, these denticle impressions disappear gradually. While this was going on, the cracks start to appear and progress in number, location and length. Once the denticle impressions disappear fully, the coin becomes the VAM-36. By the way, the obverse die was retired likely due to it "blowing up" from the die cracks. The reverse was then re-married to a different obverse die (VAM-39.1) which became the VAM-49. The VAM-49 die marriage was short lived, due to the extensive cracking it had when it was married in the VAM-49 marriage. As far as value of your coin, it is a generic 1904-O that carries no premium.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,750 |
|