Reading this thread and thinking back to my College physics class (1 day of optics) and some of the other stuff floating around and I've figured out what Ray is leading us to!
The P&S world is all about taking the decisions (other than PTB - Push The Button) away from the photographer. Sure some of them have zoom controls, but mostly that's it - PTB, camera reads the scene, decides the aperture and exposure, focuses the lens for maximum sharpness at some specific point or points and SNAP.
Newer ones come with 20-picture burst modes (pick the one where everyone's eyes are open), face recog (camera waits until eyes are open), etc. Dog/Cat mode to avoid green eye, etc. Still PTB.
Even the prosumer cameras have automatic modes and studies show MOST users never use anything else. Better lens, sometimes a better/faster computer chip making the decisions, better sensor. Still PTB.
The problem is that everything you are trying to do to photograph a coin goes against the automation. The only points with enough definition for autofocus are the rim to the background. With small depth of field (the distance from the lens to the object that's actually sharp), then you may have a sharp rim and a blurry field of the coin. Same kinds of problems exist with the highly reflective surface of the coin which breaks the auto-exposure expectations about areas of dark and light across the whole image.
I also figured out why Ray is recommending duplicating/enlarger lenses... because they are optimized to do one thing and one thing only - take a flat image (the negative) and project it onto a flat surface (the photo paper) with absolute sharpness at that one constant distance. If, 1mm away from that distance the image is blurry it doesn't matter. Here we are doing the inverse (flat object to flat sensor), but the lens works fine in reverse (that's basic optics). And while that's WRONG WRONG WRONG for normal photography - it's exactly what we want for coin photography!
But almost nobody does photo darkroom anymore, so what used to be a $500 top of the line enlarger lens is now selling for firesale prices. And if most of the camera modes aren't of any use for our purposes, why pay for them? (Unless you are also planning to use the same camera body for normal photography)
Remember, you are giving up all the automation. Manual setup, manual focus, maybe even manual exposure.
Then they are going to lead us to setting the white balance (that's how you tell the camera what is truly white so it knows how to map the charge in the wells of the CCD into colors in the photo) (most cameras are designed for an average 18% grey - good for my grey cat, not so good for a DMPL coin). Not sure what comes next.
-----Burton
The P&S world is all about taking the decisions (other than PTB - Push The Button) away from the photographer. Sure some of them have zoom controls, but mostly that's it - PTB, camera reads the scene, decides the aperture and exposure, focuses the lens for maximum sharpness at some specific point or points and SNAP.
Newer ones come with 20-picture burst modes (pick the one where everyone's eyes are open), face recog (camera waits until eyes are open), etc. Dog/Cat mode to avoid green eye, etc. Still PTB.
Even the prosumer cameras have automatic modes and studies show MOST users never use anything else. Better lens, sometimes a better/faster computer chip making the decisions, better sensor. Still PTB.
The problem is that everything you are trying to do to photograph a coin goes against the automation. The only points with enough definition for autofocus are the rim to the background. With small depth of field (the distance from the lens to the object that's actually sharp), then you may have a sharp rim and a blurry field of the coin. Same kinds of problems exist with the highly reflective surface of the coin which breaks the auto-exposure expectations about areas of dark and light across the whole image.
I also figured out why Ray is recommending duplicating/enlarger lenses... because they are optimized to do one thing and one thing only - take a flat image (the negative) and project it onto a flat surface (the photo paper) with absolute sharpness at that one constant distance. If, 1mm away from that distance the image is blurry it doesn't matter. Here we are doing the inverse (flat object to flat sensor), but the lens works fine in reverse (that's basic optics). And while that's WRONG WRONG WRONG for normal photography - it's exactly what we want for coin photography!
But almost nobody does photo darkroom anymore, so what used to be a $500 top of the line enlarger lens is now selling for firesale prices. And if most of the camera modes aren't of any use for our purposes, why pay for them? (Unless you are also planning to use the same camera body for normal photography)
Remember, you are giving up all the automation. Manual setup, manual focus, maybe even manual exposure.
Then they are going to lead us to setting the white balance (that's how you tell the camera what is truly white so it knows how to map the charge in the wells of the CCD into colors in the photo) (most cameras are designed for an average 18% grey - good for my grey cat, not so good for a DMPL coin). Not sure what comes next.
-----Burton
-----Burton
50 year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973)
Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA
Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, OnLine Coin Club
Owned by four cats and a wife of 40 years (joined 1983)