| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 2,752 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4589 Posts |
The monetary act of 1853 made non-US coins non legal tender, but that doesn't prevent a merchant from choosing to accept Canadian coins for a purchase, nor - if the buyer will accept it - from making change in Canadian. One sees this a lot in border communities today for the convenience of the merchant and customer.
My current interest is circulated coinage from 1861. February 1861. February 11th, 1861. At 8:05am Central Standard Time (which, I know didn't exist back then, but 5m is the February offset between Solar time and what became CST).
On that day, my subject began a train ride from the US West with a little over $100 in his pocket.
On the trip, he spent that Sunday in Buffalo, NY. While there wasn't a bridge in those days, there was certainly a lot of cross-border traffic and commerce.
And I know (am learning) about Canadian coinage of the period, both decimal 1858/1859 issues and the pre-decimal Sterling based coinage. A half penny would have been worth about 1.7 cents, but even in Canada in those days was discounted 20% or so.
So my real question is whether my subject could have purchased a newspaper or several at his Buffalo hotel that Sunday (he had a major interest in US current events, including politics) and received a Canadian coin or two in change.
Unlike today, the sizes and weights are very different, but I'm wondering if it was possible. If it is, I can devote an addendum to my collection to these coins.
If not, I've already purchased a nice example that would show why NOT. And I would still need to buy example(s) of the pre-decimal coinage to compare vs. US of the period <grin>.
-----Burton -----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2087 Posts |
Your question seems a little fuzzy to me.....if you are asking was it possible that Canadian coins circulate in the US in 1861 then the answer is: probably I am sure Spanish and Mexican dollars still circulated in the US as well. As you say near the borders people are more tolerant of different coinage
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
950 Posts |
Interesting question. We take it almost for granted today that you will get some canadian coins every now and then, but it is becuase most people dont even notice the difference. That would be similar to someone trying to pass a canadian bill in the US today since they are impossible to confuse, and I would imagine that a penny then could buy more than a dollar could now.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4589 Posts |
Quote: That would be similar to someone trying to pass a canadian bill in the US today since they are impossible to confuse Exactly. Today coins are the same size and weight and similar metallic composition. But the weights and sizes are vastly different in 1861.
- The Canadian large cents of 1858-1859 (Province of Canada) weigh 4.54 grams with a diameter of 25.4 mm.
- The US Braided Hair large cents weigh 10.89 grams with a diameter of 27 mm.
So it's not as if you won't know that you received something different, even if US Large and Small cents were still in circulation. There were also Canadian pre-decimal half-penny and penny circulating in Canada at the time. They were worth - by the exchange rates set in CDN law - around 1.7 and 3.4 cents US each. But even in Canada at the time, they circulated for about a 20% discount. Yes, I know - in terms of my typeset it's a mink hole. (For those who do not know the term, a mink hole is just like a rabbit hole, but lined with much nicer fur and so you don't want to leave it). -----Burton
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4589 Posts |
Quote: I am sure Spanish and Mexican dollars still circulated in the US as well. Actually they did not circulate. Certainly not in the settled east such as Buffalo, NY. The US coinage act of 1853 removed the legal tender status of ALL foreign coins. It setup a very beneficial exchange rate for Spanish and Mexican silver dollars to buy in the silver to the US Treasury for minting of US coins. The act also corrected the coin weights so that the silver content was slightly below face, stopping the export of US coins (that is why there are arrows on the date, to indicate the new less valuable coins so the older ones could be pulled to be reminted)
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
I would bet that some pre-confederation coinage did circulate near the border in NY. The Notre Dame site may have some hints.... http://www.coins.nd.edu/ . Until 1861 I do not know. Quote:
Quote: I am sure Spanish and Mexican dollars still circulated in the US as well.
Actually they did not circulate. Certainly not in the settled east such as Buffalo, NY.
While I cannot speak for western NY. At some point I believe they did. I have heard anecdotal evidence that silver Reales were in use, at least in the Albany area, by several detectorists who have found these coins.
Edited by amida17 09/20/2013 8:22 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4589 Posts |
Big difference between the early 1800s and 1861. Certainly, EVERYTHING circulated in 1800s, and much of it was even legal tender (you have to read the old coinage acts to see, but it's there and unlike today's laws, they are just 2 or 3 paragraphs). And it made sense - the US couldn't mint enough coinage to meet the demand. Merchants had a book (I wish I could remember what it's called) that showed them drawings of all the common coins from all over the world and their worth. So you could take in a Spanish dollar and a half Shilling and for a $2 purchase and make the correct change. But the point of the 1853 act ( http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampag...&recNum=181) was to move all of the foreign coinage out. So it was no longer legal tender, BUT the treasury - for the mint - was BUYING Spanish and Mexican dollars at good rates.
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
Quote: Merchants had a book (I wish I could remember what it's called) I wish you could remember as well. My point being that even in 1861, legal tender or not, coinage that was accepted in Canada was likely also accepted on the border between the U. S. and Canada. Quote: much of it was even legal tender (you have to read the old coinage acts to see, but it's there and unlike today's laws, they are just 2 or 3 paragraphs). Agreed. Crosby writes about this.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2087 Posts |
Quote: Actually they did not circulate. Certainly not in the settled east such as Buffalo, NY. Actually that's not the impression I get reading "The United states Trade dollar" by John M Willem. Yes a law had been passed to make non US coins no longer legal tender......but in China the mexican dollar was preferred and US traders purchased it for trade to the far east. I find it hard to imagine that foreign coins that were necessary to mediate trade, did not circulate in the USA. The US Trade dollar was developed to compete with the Mexican.
Edited by austrokiwi 09/21/2013 12:13 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
4589 Posts |
Well, the act made them not legal tender. Of course, merchant and customer can choose to settle a debt anyway as long as it's legal. So that $20 I owe you, I could pay in a double eagle or 20 $1 coins and you have to take it. If I offer you 20 Mexican silver dollars and you say no, I still have to pay you. The Trade dollar - or so I've read - was created because the US Silver Dollar wasn't quite the same amount of silver as the Mexican/Spanish dollar and so wasn't liked (valued equally) in the Orient. The idea was to have a US coin of the same weight that would not circulate within the US.
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
You may not get a definite yes or no answer. But it is highly probable that he received a Canadian coin or two in change. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2087 Posts |
Quote:The Trade dollar - or so I've read - was created because the US Silver Dollar wasn't quite the same amount of silver as the Mexican/Spanish dollar and so wasn't liked (valued equally) in the Orient. The idea was to have a US coin of the same weight that would not circulate within the US. I think the story is a little more complicated and a bit wierder than we might imagine. The general expectation is that the higher the silver content the more acceptable a coin is. However Gresham's law suggests a different behavior. why I think this. The french Trade dollar ( for Indochina) struggled to circulate when it was first introduced. the reason being the silver content was too high. merchants readily accepted the coin but would hoard it as a result the coin quickly disappeared from circulation. The french responded by lowering the silver content. the result was what they had hoped for the Piastre du Commerce circulated. Its not been documented anywhere but part of the Trade dollars problem might have been it had too much silver in it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Several comments. The Act of 1853 did not remove the legal tender status of foreign coins. You are thinking of the Act of Feb 1857. And even that allowed a two year grace period which was later extended for another two years and then had one year cut from it. So all the legal tender status for those coins that had it was not removed until late 1860. (Contrary to common belief, not all foreign coins were legal tender in the US before the act of 1857. in fact only a select few were legal tender.) Just because a coin isn't legal tender, that doesn't mean it won't circulate. Near the border canadian coins can still be found circulating in the US and they aren't legal tender. And the government continued to post rates at whixch Spanish and Mexican silver would be accepted at the post office and other government offices until the 1870's. Something they would not have done if they weren't still circulating at least to some extent. The chances of getting a Canadian coin in 1861 probably would not have been very good. The mintages of the 1858-59 coinage was rather small and probably didn't get around much. Canadian coins would have been seldom seen. (In fact if you had gone over into Canada you would have found that almost all the coins in circulation would have been US coins and this would become the trend even more so over the next couple years. So much so that there was no need for Canada to issue more coins until 1870.) And the sizes and weights of the coins were not that different. Yes the size of the cents were much different but maybe not so much the weights. The Canadian large cent was 4.54 grams, but the US cent was 4.67 grams. The heavy US Large Cent was becoming scarce by 1861 and the coppernickel cent would have been more common. (And if size difference between the two US coins didn't cause a problem here why should the size difference between the large canadian and smaller US cent have problems?) The Canadian 5 cent was 1.16 grams compared to the US Half Dime at 1.24 grams. And the Canadian 10 cent was 2.32 grams to the US 2.49 grams. So those two coins were almost interchangeable. Quote: So that $20 I owe you, I could pay in a double eagle or 20 $1 coins and you have to take it. that was the accepted view in the 19th century, legal tender meant it had to be accepted. This is not the current legal viewpoint. The Trade dollar was created because the US dollar had too little silver in it. When we tried to "break in" to trade with China the Spanish 8 Reales and later Mexican Peso had already been long established. We came in with the US dollar which we tried to say was equivalent to the other two coins but it had significantly less silver in it and it was rejected. We had to buy Mexican pesos at a premium to carry on trade. So the heavier Trade dollar was created to compete at par. The face value of the coin was still slightly higher than the metal content, and the had legal tender status to five dollars so they also circulated here. When silver values fell in the mid 1870's their value in China where they were accepted by weight also fell. But since they were legal tender here they were now worth significantly more as money here than they were as silver in China and they all started flooding home. But we wanted the silver to LEAVE the country so we stripped the Trade dollar of its legal tender status hoping that would keep them out of the country.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 2,752 |
|