| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,244 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
339 Posts |
I took a chance on this one from an ebay seller that had some negative feedback and got a good deal.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Israel
2420 Posts |
The reverse photo is a bit small, but I'll say MS64.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
286 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2541 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I'd go MS63 because of the reverse eye appeal and this being a better date. If the reverse looks better in-hand it could easily be a 64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
4411 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
MS63
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
919 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
I agree with BH1964. if the reverse looks better that than pic MS64 otherwise 63
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
339 Posts |
So yes, the reverse does look better in hand. It has some unattractive splotchy black toning, but the luster shines right through it. The splotchy toning showed up more in the photos than it does in hand. 
Edited by Geohoarder 09/19/2013 11:54 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Israel
2420 Posts |
Don't take it the wrong way, but if you're trying to hide the serial number, you're doing it wrong. The barcode is easily readable, and you might like to hide it as well.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,244 |
|