| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 2,314 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
Hi all  I'm trying to figure out if this coin is genuine. What immediately looked odd to me was the G in his name on the obverse. If it's counterfeit, it would be good to know if it's contemporary or modern. Thoughts?   thanks!
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
I think it's just how the die was cut Renee. Cool coin!
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3253 Posts |
Why don't I see the pics?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1351 Posts |
Standard copper coin of William 111. The workmanship was awful.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2669 Posts |
Thanks.. I was real curious since I've never seen one with a letter missing parts like this, especially when the surrounding parts are so strong.
philadelphian, I'm not sure.. the pictures are on photobucket.com - are you able to view pictures hosted there?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3253 Posts |
Apparently not. The suspense is killing me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2669 Posts |
heh.. are these better?  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3253 Posts |
Thank you. Now I can sleep tonight.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
602 Posts |
Don't freak out, but it just might say 1600, not 1699 :3
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3253 Posts |
So, that's Elizabeth I dressed up as William III for Halloween?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2669 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
51 Posts |
Hi there, not only is this coin genuine but it appears that it may be the rarer unbarred A's in BRITANNIA variety which would add some value. You would need to look closely with a lense to see if they are just weakly struck or non-existant but probably worth doing for the price difference!
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 2,314 |
|