Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1809 Half Cent - Question

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,159Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
EFLargeCents's Avatar
United States
1304 Posts
 Posted 10/31/2013  2:04 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add EFLargeCents to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I am looking for some input regarding the omission (or failure) of the proper major variety type on the slab. The C-5 variety is considered a major variety and would not have required an extra fee according to NGC's guidelines. I guess they just missed it. Is it worth sending to PCGS (I'm putting together a group to submit to them) to cross at the same grade or better and have them put the correct attribution on it? I know I'm probably just paying for the words on the slab if I do this since someone like myself will market the coin as such if I went to sell it, but I think there is also a slight chance it could grade higher as well, even with the scratch. I have 6 others slabbed of this type for comparison and this is a little nicer than a PCGS 1828 XF40.

Another consideration is that the coining method in 1809 was much different than what was done in 1828, which lends me to believe that the relative condition of the 1809 is all that much greater. I think its worth a shot at a higher grade as this variety is somewhat more popular than the series in general. Thoughts?

1809-Half-Cent---Question

On a side note, I've noticed a lack of consistency in grading these from both PCGS and NGC. I have an AU50 that looks AU58 and an AU53 that looks XF45.
Edited by EFLargeCents
10/31/2013 2:05 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 10/31/2013  2:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Having formalized their attribution services (read: having found they can charge money for it), you can assume that "free" attribution - even for the most common varieties - is likely a thing of the past for TPG's. One would think that a TPG would automatically factor striking processes and the poorer early planchets into their grading flow; one would likely be disappointed quite often as a result.

Especially with regard to early Copper, I wouldn't be too very concerned with grade and variety on the slab. Copper specialists tend to be well-read and informed, and they're quite up to forming an accurate grade opinion and attribution as long as your images are up to the task.

There's a reason I (sort of jokingly) often grade early Copper as "PCGS AU50/EAC VG08."
Pillar of the Community
kanga's Avatar
United States
5825 Posts
 Posted 10/31/2013  3:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kanga to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Same problem.
I bought a slabbed 1809 Half Cent, variety C-4.
Whoever had it slabbed didn't pay the fee for NGC Variety Plus.
So I sent it in and paid to have the label updated.
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 11/01/2013  10:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Another consideration is that the coining method in 1809 was much different than what was done in 1828,

Coining method was the same in both years, screw press with an open collar. There may have been a difference in the source of the copper planchets.


Quote:
Having formalized their attribution services (read: having found they can charge money for it), you can assume that "free" attribution - even for the most common varieties - is likely a thing of the past for TPG's.

Which might not be too bad if they could get the attributions right a higher percentage of the time, and if they guaranteed the attribution.
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,159Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.19 seconds to rattle this change. Forums