| Author |
Replies: 30 / Views: 3,992 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
308 Posts |
I'm gonna say MS64 due to some of the small marks on the reverse and the type of toning on the obverse. But definitely a nice coin and a great buy. You did well, I'm jealous! I collect these, all I need to fill my Dansco album is a 1940d, 1937s, and a 1935d. Anyone have on to sell? Lol, had to through that one in
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
723 Posts |
Hey Spud, turn yer email on!! Or hit me up!
Edited by Jon K 12/27/2013 5:01 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
308 Posts |
I have to comment on WasQuartJesse, very nice coin. From what I understand, you should leave it slabbed to keep it safe and keep the value up on it. Am I right in that way of thinking?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
173 Posts |
Thanks Spud. Your right. Slabbed coins are generally easier to sell and easier to protect. However, many of us prefer to store and display them raw. To me, it's the coin I'm buying, regardless of which slab it's in or if it's in one at all.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
173 Posts |
Jon, the obverse just doesn't look "right" to me and I kind of get the impression you feel the same way. One thing I've learned is that if I'm ever on the fence about a Washington than others are going to be and have been as well. The obverse looks to be full of hairlines suggesting a harsh wipe at some point. There looks to be wear on the hair as well. Which is odd, because like you mentioned, the breast feathers look nice and this year/mint did NOT have an elevated reverse rim like the 32's. How do the reeds look? It looks like a scratch below the "U" of United on the reverse. Is that on the slab or coin? I've enjoyed this thread tremendously and hope you don't mind me being direct about the coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
723 Posts |
Jesse, I do not disagree. The obverse does show hairlines, though not as prominent in hand under 10-X and good light. Definitely there, but the camera picks them up big time. And they are not all in remotely the same direction. Still, might have been wiped pretty hard. That is and always has been my largest concern. The scratches on the reverse under the "U" are not severe at all. They are there, but look like minor contact marks. There is a ding under those marks that is of more concern. Overall, the obverse is troubling, but not enough to dissuade me from sending it in. It is going in next week if I can get my ducks rowed up. PCGS. Attached below are the latest pics. Cracked it out and dipped it pretty hard. I actually think I got it just right. Still a little color inside the obverse rim ( Color at 5:00 o'clock, but hard to see with the flat aspect of the camera), and didn't seem to hurt the reverse at all. That reverse continues to be nice. That obverse was Ugly (capital "U"). This one was not a close call, that ugly skin had to come off. And the hairlines did not jump out as I had feared, indeed some of the lines seemed to be in the skin and so dipped off. If it grades, I am predicting MS62 maaaybe 63. I think I have a 40% shot at a grade, but admittedly I am out of my depth. This obverse looks not quite like anything I have any experience with. Oh, purists might wish to look away at this point . . . .  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
723 Posts |
Oh, and the reeds are sharp and clean. Not problem with pointed questions, that is why I put it on here. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
723 Posts |
Shoot, I deleted the early pics. I will get them back!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
723 Posts |
Shoot, I deleted the early pics. I will get them back!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
723 Posts |
Okay, I can't edit the earlier posts, so here is the series of photos. This is what I saw to purchase the coin.   This is my best effort to photograph the coin in situ.   And this is the coin ready to send to the graders after a dip.  
Edited by Jon K 12/29/2013 11:19 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8517 Posts |
Dang, I'm really interested to see how this turns out. Good luck !
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Valued Member
United States
173 Posts |
I think you made the right call and am right there with you on the grade possibilities. To me, it looks better now. In terms of your amazing set, have you sent in alot of coins this way for grading? Have you bought odd ball slabs, raw coins, and/or respected TPG slabs for upgrade possibility? I ask because I noticed you have alot of 66's and 67's in your set. I'm very curious as I have also been working on my collection piece by piece.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
723 Posts |
Quote: Have you bought odd ball slabs, raw coins, and/or respected TPG slabs for upgrade possibility? I ask because I noticed you have alot of 66's and 67's in your set. I'm very curious as I have also been working on my collection piece by piece. Not a lot. A few. Mostly had good luck though when I do. ANACS seems to undergrade some pieces if you can find them in the small slab. I had a really good day on this one. You might remember! Indeed, that is one and the same my "Favorite Coin"! Cracked it out of an ANACS holder. : https://goccf.com/t/153473&whichpage=1 And I made reference to a '37 that came out of a 65 small ANACS holder and came back 66+ from PCGS. This coin at hand, it is going in next week and I do believe I am going down in flames. Win some, lose some.  We will see!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
723 Posts |
Yay!! I squeaked by with an no problem MS63. Didn't make a bunch of value, but it sure looks better in PCGS plastic. It is not a particularly attractive coin, but it will sit in my collection until I can get the funds together for a "65" example. Win some, lose some, break even on some. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
723 Posts |
Spud!
Are you out there? Send me a PM or an Email!!
|
| |
Replies: 30 / Views: 3,992 |