Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Ind:imp - 1947ml Vs 1948 British Coins

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,754Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
kbbpll's Avatar
United States
4233 Posts
 Posted 12/25/2013  2:18 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add kbbpll to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I only recently noticed that my 1948 British six-pence still has IND:IMP on the reverse. Does anyone know why Canada was so concerned about removing IND:IMP following the independence of India that they waited before minting actual 1948s until the obverse was changed, and yet Great Britain continued to use IND:IMP on their coins until 1949?
Pillar of the Community
nalaberong's Avatar
Canada
2805 Posts
 Posted 12/25/2013  3:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nalaberong to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Maybe we had more respect for a colony leaving absolute British dominion

Or maybe we just have a bunch of control freaks in Ottawa. Same story with the 1936 dot: "Mint INACCURATE coins?! How about you just SHOOT ME!" (proceeds to add a minute difference so everyone will know that this batch of coins is not PERFECT)

However, it didn't take much work to add the maple leaf. I have seen a picture of the maple-leaf punch - it was carved up on the spot by the Chief Engraver (the maple leaf is the same size on all denominations, because it is all the same punch) and is now in the Bank of Canada Currency Museum (which is closed for 3 years ).
Bedrock of the Community
NumisRob's Avatar
United Kingdom
17909 Posts
 Posted 12/25/2013  4:26 pm  Show Profile   Check NumisRob's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add NumisRob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I've always wondered why British coins dated 1948 still had IND IMP on them.
Perhaps large numbers were actually struck in 1947 and stockpiled for release in early 1948? Apart from the threepence, 1948 was a very high mintage year for UK coins. Or perhaps they had prepared a lot of obverse dies and didn't want to waste them - this was a period of rationing and austerity, and they had only just gone through one major change, replacing silver with cupro-nickel in 1947.
Pillar of the Community
kbbpll's Avatar
United States
4233 Posts
 Posted 12/25/2013  5:26 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kbbpll to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There's a reference on Calgary Coin website http://www.calgarycoin.com/modern/cddollar.htm :
"The redesign had to be done in England and it had to be done for every country in the British Commonwealth, and it was late in 1948 before the new half dollar dies were ready. "
which implies other commonwealth countries were similarly inspired, but I haven't looked up 1948 coins for Australia or NZ to see what happened there. I like nalaberong's control freak theory. Did we read the same article on the ML punch, nalaberong? I posted it in another thread on this topic (regarding relative value of 1947ML dollar versus 1948). Anyway, clearly I'm obsessed with this story... and I'm not even Canadian.

Edit: Looks like NZ changed from "George VI King Emperor" in 1947 to "King George The Sixth" in 1948, while Australia kept IND:IMP through 1948.
Edited by kbbpll
12/25/2013 5:56 pm
Pillar of the Community
DoubleEagle20's Avatar
United States
1748 Posts
 Posted 12/26/2013  10:55 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DoubleEagle20 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think nalaberong is probably right on both counts. Accurate dating AND respect for another country breaking away from British colonialism. Not surprised on the Brits running IMP:IND until 1949. The dissolution of its empire is difficult for any nation to accept, but is eventual. Empires rise and fall, just the normal flow of human history.
Edited by DoubleEagle20
12/26/2013 10:58 am
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,754Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to rattle this change. Forums