| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,376 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1370 Posts |
Picked this one up this morning....couldn't resist. What would you grade her?  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
274 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
785 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1584 Posts |
I think the proof-like surfaces exaggerate every little mark on this one. Even though PCGS was more conservative in the early days, I'll say 64.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
MS64
Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
It would be 63 in an old rattler.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
MS62 then - today? It would be a solid MS63.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
134 Posts |
62 to 63 for me. PCGS tends to grade hard in my experience
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1370 Posts |
Here she is. This one is actually the clearest pic of the bunch....cheek is awfully clean. Definitely feel it's a strong 63 but I wouldn't be shocked to see this in a 64 holder today. May have to CAC it....see what they think. 
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
134 Posts |
So who was the grading company for that?
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
134 Posts |
oops, nvm, I just saw it was on the topic
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,376 |
|