| Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 5,182 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
500 Posts |
After thinking about it for a couple of years now, I finally signed up with PCGS to try to cross-over 4 coins. Two NGC's and two ANAC's. I'm hoping their eye pop and low numbers - all 4 are low numbers for the other TPG's - might help get them crossed over. Two are late buffs in 67, the other two are $10 Indians in 61&62. I guess I'll find out how good my "eye" is by the batting avg!   Most worried won't cross:   Least worried about:   Edited by BuffalosRock 03/24/2014 2:21 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
When you say 'crossover,' you mean same grade with a new holder? Or are you looking to have them graded higher? I'm kinda new to this, so sorry if it's a silly question.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
I agree the 67 buffs will be the hardest. Even in late dates with the exception of the 38 D and to a lesser extent the 37 D the PCGS MS 67 population is pretty low. Quote: hen you say 'crossover,' you mean same grade with a new holder? Or are you looking to have them graded higher? Hes trying to have them switched from an NGC holder into PCGS ones at the same grade or higher. Crossover is basically when you send in a slabbed coin and theyll put it in their holder if they agree its the same grade or higher unless you specify any grade or a lower minimum grade they agree with. If their grade doesn't match what you specified they return the coin the its original holder untouched. PCGS lets you try with any slabs, while NGC last time I checked will only consider PCGS slabs.
Edited by basebal21 03/25/2014 01:28 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
500 Posts |
basebal21 is correct. I am submitting coins in other TPG slabs to PCGS hoping they will agree they are the same grade ( or higher but that rarely happens from what I gather ) and thus crack them out and re-slab them in PCGS holders/slabs. I admit this is somewhat due to having become a PCGS-bigot and having "fell for" their registry set gimmick/scam - j/k sorta. But IMO it is just a plain fact that PCGS coins get higher selling prices than NGC and much higher than ANACS or ICG. So it is worth it to me, for these coins only, to try to get them crossed-over to a better-value slab. Not to mention that if they do cross I'll be close to the #1 $10 indian date set and #5 late buff herd set. basebal21. I waited so long because I didn't have 4 I felt worthy of trying. But I was tempted to try 1-2 basement slabbed coins for lower cross - the 4 I am doing would decrease in value too much if they downgraded any but I have a few NNC bull-pucky slabs that I got very cheap and would take 3-4 grades lower. But I only see references to NGC, ANACS and ICG on the PCGS website. Will they take basement slabbed as well? Or do they consider those "raw" if submitted? That's what I presume but maybe you know! Also, the buff pictured is a 37-D 67 and the other is a 36 67 that I consider an exceptional strike and so clean and pristine I will be more than a bit PO-ed if it doesn't CROSS. But who knows, I could go 0-4 or 4-4. I did read a post on PCGS where a guy claims to have crossed over 26 out of 26 including 14 upgrades in the mix. Now he may be FOS, and plenty of others have never had one successfully cross - in 10,20 tries etc. I think the percents are somewhere in the mid 30's like about 35% overall ( for NGC and ANACS ) so it is less than a 50-50 prop. My hope is 4/4, realistically I'll be fine with 2/4. As long as one crosses it should be worth it $-wise as I bought all 4 at bargain prices - the two buffs at well less than half listed retail for example. Thanks! And wish me luck! 
Edited by BuffalosRock 03/25/2014 2:34 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: Will they take basement slabbed as well? Or do they consider those "raw" if submitted? That's what I presume but maybe you know! My understanding is theyll consider anything. Their stance is they want the best coins in PCGS holders regardless of where it came from. With that said though theyll be exceptionally hard on basement slabbers since they cant be trusted to have done any due diligence on the authenticity of the coin to begin with where an NGC coin they can assume is real from the start. So theyll be doing work on it through a slab putting you at a huge disadvantage. Basement slabs I would personally crack out instead of cross. In your case I think you did the right thing trying the crossover considering the value difference of the 66 and 67s there. When its not sitting on the otherside of a big jump like that Ill usually just crack it out and submit raw if its anything besides an NGC slab or old little white ANACS slab. Even NGC slabs Ill sometimes crack out, the little white ANACS slabs have their own fan base though so there is some value if its doesn't cross. As far as the success rate its a little deceptive. I saw that post too about the guy going 26 for 26, I do think thats possible to do with enough time and effort spent hand picking coins and I think he had a couple big guns helping him out with his decision. But most people wont put that effort into their picks. The "A" coins aka slam dunk CAC ones seem like they generally cross, its just that there arent a lot like that out there. On the flip side the "C" lower end of the grade coins seem to almost never cross at grade. It seems a good number of cross overs come from the groups where the PCGS coins have a significantly higher value where theyre generally much tighter at those grade levels. I believe a lot of the failures come from that group. The success rate seems to be a lot better if you give them a grade to lose, eg if youre fine with an vf 35 crossing as a 30. Submitting raw is definitely the best chance at getting the desired grade since they can see the coin in hand with nothing in the way, but there are times where crossovers make more sense from a risk standpoint. Ill be impressed if both your buffalos cross, you could do well if youre able to distinguish those quality 67s and keep crossing them. From your pic though that gold looks like that one should at least.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
500 Posts |
Finally got my "4 freebie" coupon in the mail last Thursday and sent my cross-over tries out that afternoon. They are up to 17 days estimated turn-around, so it may be quite a while still before I find out. A dealer cold-called me last Friday and I mentioned sending in some crossovers - he wasn't too encouraging about the success liklihood either. I just hope I hit atleast the 38% they claim they are doing!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2133 Posts |
How did a dealer know your details to cold-call you ?
Does PCGS provide new customer details to favoured dealers ?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
500 Posts |
I signed up on their website about 2 months ago. But I didn't ask to be called or contacted or anything so I consider that a "cold call" from them. It had nothing to do with PCGS. I've never had a dealer call me out of the blue like that before is all.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
500 Posts |
Just an update.
I hope my luck changes as the USPS lost track of my "registered mail" shipment for a week. I sent it 4/10 and it estimated delivery 4/12. When there was no update by 4/16, and no tracking entry since 4/11, I called and opened a case. They said they'd get back to me by 4/19 at the latest. At about 2am 4/19 it finally showed up as being in CAL. Then made it to PCGS on Mon 4/21. IMO they should refund something when it takes 11 days like that - but I guess they only do that if you pay the big bucks of priority express overnight to boot. Otherwise they can take their time.
Has been sitting in their "in process" status ever since. I think they are less attentive to the "freebie" CLUB orders so it may well be days still before I see any movement. They list 15 business days as average but I see a lot of orders that take more than a month to get turned around.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
They say that Registered mail takes longer, but for what they charge, that is ridiculous. Last week I sent 2 coins into PCGS, and sent it Priority Insured in a small flat rate box. I wasn't a super valuable shipment, only $1000. When I found out that Registered would have been only $2 more, I thought I should have sent it Registered, but after reading your post I'm glad I didn't. Mine got there in 3 days. If it would have been a real valuable shipment I would have definitely done the Registered thing though.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1511 Posts |
Registered takes a long time, I believe it's usually an average of 10 days. (What I was told at least. Same thing happened with my first experience sending a big value package in, I was out, calling everyday... Sketchy, lol. Then all was good 11 days later, so I really wouldn't be too worried. Registered has to be unlocked then signed for, passed off, signed by the recipient, put back into a lock box, then on it's way.... at each and every stop of the way. It takes much longer than the regular mail just being passed through quick.
And I guess they don't scan it at nearly every stop either..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
500 Posts |
Why do they estimate 2-day then if it actually takes 10 or more? Their website says to open a case after 6 days I believe. I guess it is better NOT TO SEND IT REGISTERED, even though PCGS is adament that you should. Perhaps they know that is slower and will get folks used to long waits? LOL I actually thought that because I insured it pretty well they might have figured it was less important to actually deliver it.
You'd think they'd scan a registered package MORE than a simple first class tracked item. But I get a lot more feedback on a $1.93 package than I did on this one of over $31. That seems bassackwards to me! 3-4 times longer to deliver, less tracking, yet 15X as much! This is literally the first thing I've ever sent registered. I doubt I ever will again as it is a complete rip-off IMO!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1511 Posts |
Ya I know, the two day estimate it lists is ridiculous, and quite frankly completely untrue. It's funny that it lists registered as two days, but everyone you talk to will estimate 10-11 days. At least everyone I've talked to at both the PO and ANACS for my first submission told me ten days was the "expected norm". I don't know what the site says about times or opening a case as it's been a while since I looked, but if you google how long registered mail takes everyone will say around ten days, lol. And I'm pretty sure with registered mail you cannot open a claim until 15 days after sent (15-60 days it used to say)... Or according to the USPS site at least. So I guess that should be take with a grain of salt, lol. Quote: You'd think they'd scan a registered package MORE than a simple first class tracked item. I know bud, lol, your preaching to the choir. It seems like it's totally backwards. When I asked/ told them the exact same thing, if I remember correctly, the scanning it less had to do with security issues, something about how if someone hacked the tracking numbers (or someone told someone) about a high value insured package that they could intercept it somehow. That with registered/insured packages no info of the location is posted throughout transit because they don't want the location of valuable packages available online at all. Or something like that... It was a while ago that this happened to me (well, the first time that I was fought unaware at least) so I don't remember exactly. But it had something to do with security. When I send packages to the TPG'er it's scanned at the post office I drop it off at, then at my local sort facility, and then nothing until it arrives at whichever TPG I send it to.. Like clockwork. Backwards and nerve racking? Yes... But good news is they've always got there and I've always gotten them back... Anyways, I hope you get the grades your hoping for! O, and what type of ANACS slabs were the ones you sent in? And if you don't mind me asking, what was your reasons for wanting to cross them over? Are you working on a PCGS register set? Or for resale purposes? Or?
Edited by NathanASE 05/01/2014 10:25 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: You'd think they'd scan a registered package MORE than a simple first class tracked item. It stands to reason, to me, that part of effective security for a package whose value could be $25k would be to minimize the amount of publicly-available information about it. And that would apply internally as well as externally; chances are the danger is greater from an inside job than anything else. So, yeah, physically sign for the package at every step, heaving a hardcopy trail. But don't make that trail available to any postal employee with access to the internal computer system. It means that physical tracking is more difficult since a human being has to act at every location on the package's journey, inspecting the sign-in sheet, but that's a tradeoff I'll accept.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1511 Posts |
Ya ^^^ that's basically what they told me when I originally asked, and it makes sense. At first I thought the same as you, that they should scan registered at least the same if not more, but like they told me and SsuperDdave said, they don't want that info of locations available online for those who know where/ how to look for it. So it's actually in your benefit that the teachings not updated as often
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
500 Posts |
NathanASE, The ANACS slabs are the little white ones - the 1908 $10 was/is #614345, I don't have the other handy. The NGC slabs also had low cert numbers like under 3 million.
All 4 are intended for PCGS registry sets, but I also wouldn't mind the bump in value that PCGS slabs get - in general. I see that for the last month crossover %'s are up to 44%, so maybe they are getting less stingy? LOL Hope so!
So they scan it less because they don't trust their own employees with detailed info about expensive packages. SMH Go figure!
|
| |
Replies: 20 / Views: 5,182 |