Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Some "Cap & Rays" 8 Reales Questions

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,407Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Lucky Cuss's Avatar
United States
4883 Posts
 Posted 04/07/2014  6:30 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Lucky Cuss to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
1) To judge from current published guides, why are so many mintage quantities prior to about 1880 evidently unknown? Surely a yearly tally at each mint would've been compiled, reported, and recorded? How is it that such basic information seems to be no longer available?

2) Why are so, so many examples cleaned, and usually badly, and I mean "Brillo pad" or even "buffing wheel" badly? It just seems discouragingly endemic with these.

3) Why in the period 1969 through 1873, when the "Balanza" Un Peso was being struck, was there continuing and concurrent production of the supposedly superceded 8 Reales design? I've never heard a satisfactory explanation for this. In 1870-71, for example, the Culiacan, Durango, Guadalajara, Guanajuato, San Luis Potosi, and Zacatecas mints supposedly all made both types. Was the alternate output intended for export (my understanding being that the Chinese resisted accepting the new, smaller diameter peso denominated coin)?

I apologize in advance if there is source material that answers any or all of the above, but I haven't seen or been able to locate it up to now.
Colligo ergo sum
Pillar of the Community
jfransch's Avatar
United States
1801 Posts
 Posted 04/07/2014  10:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jfransch to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Lucky Cuss
1870 was a transition year where several of the mints started the year minting Resplandores and then shifted production to balance scale pesos mid year (or even sooner). Many of the 1870 dated Cap and Ray coins are extreme rarities due to very small partial year mintages and the huge percentage that were exported to the Asian trade. A few of the mints struck resplandores in 1871 and 1872 but I am not sure those few mints also struck the peso coins as well. I am at work and without access to my library, I can check when I get home.
The best book so far on the Cap and Ray coins is the Dunigan/Parker reference book called "Resplandores" which is still available from Mike Dunigan and many other coin stores that specialize in Mexican Coinage.
Valued Member
Germany
194 Posts
 Posted 04/08/2014  04:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dosmundos to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Many mints were operated under private lease. My first guess would be that most documents, including production figures, stayed with the company and were not sent to government / state archives.

Actually, I would say that even on a worldwide basis, most coins are cleaned, if you take a closer look at them. Some more expertly than others. But in public sales and dealers' lists, usually only the better (i.e., not badly cleaned) ones show up. So it's not just the 8 Reales. However, comparatively less 8 reales survived in uncirculated condition than, for example, Morgan dollars. Truly mint state examples with few bagmarks (which end up in these plastic coffins as MS64 or better) are really, really scarce and even unattainable for many DAMs.

Pillar of the Community
Lucky Cuss's Avatar
United States
4883 Posts
 Posted 04/08/2014  10:29 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Lucky Cuss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I find it highly implausible that the branch mints, which admittedly the Mexican government for a long time supervised too loosely, still wouldn't have been required at the very least to report how many coins they had struck during a calendar year. Now, whether these figures were archived, and if so, whether anybody has ever researched them, may be another question altogether. What's interesting is that in the guides I've looked at, for some years in the 1870's, a stray branch mint quantity (deemed to be possibly partial) is given, and such are documented for all the mints in the years 1877-78, and also for some years in the early to mid 1880's. Starting in 1886, the quantities appear to be well verified for all the mints. But prior to 1873, there's nothing, not even for the mother mint in Mexico City.
Colligo ergo sum
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,407Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.26 seconds to rattle this change. Forums