Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Why Were There No 1916 Barber Halves?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,520Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community

United States
5207 Posts
 Posted 04/16/2014  9:31 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add jack jeckel to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
The Barber silver series ran from 1892 to 1916.

There were 1916 Barber dimes and 1916 Mercury dimes.

There were 1916 Barber quarters and 1916 Standing Liberty quarters.

Whey were there no 1916 Barber halves to go with the 1916 Walking Liberty halves.
Pillar of the Community
Cruisinfusion's Avatar
United States
1531 Posts
 Posted 04/16/2014  9:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Cruisinfusion to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The mint wanted to make future numismatists angry!
Pillar of the Community
MeadowviewCollector's Avatar
United States
4409 Posts
 Posted 04/16/2014  10:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MeadowviewCollector to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There was demand for dimes and quarters but the new designs weren't ready so the mint fired up the presses and coined Barber dimes and quarters.

There wasn't a pressing need for half dollars or the mint likely had a stockpile of them from 1915 so they waited until the Walking Liberty half design was ready.

There were also production problems with the Mercury dimes and the Standing Liberty quarter.


-MV
Pillar of the Community
matthewvincent's Avatar
United States
3486 Posts
 Posted 04/17/2014  06:26 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add matthewvincent to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
After two years of low mintages 1915 produced about 2.8 million halves.
WWI increased demand for coins to fuel the economy.
The 1916-D Mercury was only produced in December; one month.
The number of Barber quarters produced in 1915 and 1916 exceeded 15 million
which precluded a large number of 1916 Standing Liberties.
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 04/17/2014  09:48 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think Matthewvincent has touched on the reason. Design problems delayed the dime and the quarter until late in the year so the Barbers continued. But the half dollar was ready earlier in the year so they started production while they still had supplies of the previous years Barbers on hand.So there was no need to strike 1916 Barber halves.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts
 Posted 04/17/2014  10:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add just carl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The mint wanted to make future numismatists angry!

Oddly enough that really doesn't come up a lot. 1916 was a real messy year for coins. I wonder if there is anyone at any branch of the Mint that could really answer that. Might be more to it than we all think.
Valued Member
baldy's Avatar
United States
83 Posts
 Posted 04/18/2014  5:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add baldy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The 1915-D and 1915-S both had mintages of over one million each, while all issues from 1913 and 1914 were well under a million. Maybe this was to satisfy demand until the new design was ready?
Edited by baldy
04/18/2014 5:16 pm
Pillar of the Community
United States
1590 Posts
 Posted 04/19/2014  11:48 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jmkendall to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The mint wanted to make future numismatists angry!

While I think Mathew Vincent hit square on the head. I remember reading in a book on Buffalo nickels that there was one year that San Francisco minted some really low numbers of Buffalo's, because of low demand. It seems the Mint Director ordered San Francisco to make more lest the ones being released be hoarded by those 'crazy coin collectors'. While that is the story, I have also read where it was years before there were any mintage figures available to the public, so I have to wonder about that.
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,520Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.29 seconds to rattle this change. Forums