Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsJoin Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1945-D/D Lincoln Cent With Possible "D's" On Date ?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,870Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Collector-Corner's Avatar
872 Posts
 Posted 05/07/2014  12:17 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Collector-Corner to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I bought a bunch of BU rolls dated in the early to mid 1940's to 1955 and I am currently going through one of the 1945-D rolls again to pluck out the rather difficult to see RPM's> I have to magnify them pretty close to see them due to the texture of the coin.

So, I look at this 1945-D, and it just looked..... weird.

The straight on shot caught my eye, but it still didn't look like a clear image of what was going on. I changed the lighting a tad and this is the best shot I could get;



1945-D/D-Lincoln-Cent-With-Possible-

I don't view coins from one angle - ever. I quickly turned that date upside down, and seen a bit more of what was going on with this coin.



1945-D/D-Lincoln-Cent-With-Possible-

It wasn't until I flipped the coin on a 45 degree angle that I could actually see what was going on. To me, under the scope it looks like a "D" was double tapped onto the tail of the "9" in the date. I can see 2/3rds of an oval circle and two distinct corners of something, possibly the corner of a "D". Since the punch was not resting flat on the field, it probably wasn't able to properly display the "D" on the field.

I don't know, it looks pretty promising to me under the scope. Its definitely something. The Easy Way out is to call it a clash and move on. This sort of find is fun, and for the heck of it, I will probably send it to John Wexler once he is all caught up. He may get a kick out of this.



1945-D/D-Lincoln-Cent-With-Possible-

When I blow this pic up below, to 300% I see some really weird stuff just under the "9". Almost looks like two "D's" side by side directly under the date.


1945-D/D-Lincoln-Cent-With-Possible-
Edited by Collector-Corner
05/07/2014 12:34 am
Pillar of the Community
Rackster's Avatar
United States
4809 Posts
 Posted 05/07/2014  07:39 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Rackster to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hard to see what you're seeing Gary, but having the coin in hand and positioning it to catch light this way and that makes the evaluation more meaningful. From the shots, my mind can place a punch where you hypothesized. But all I see is a nick (or clash). Oddly, the full obverse shot seems to have a ghostly image of a backwards D adjacent to the mintmark (mirrored). Funny how the eyes and mind can play games like that. I suppose those moments are what make the faithful see what they want to see in the French toast, tree bark, or freezer frost. Maybe you do have a new variety in hand. Either way, pretty cool D/D.
Pillar of the Community
Collector-Corner's Avatar
872 Posts
 Posted 05/07/2014  11:42 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Collector-Corner to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
One thing that changes lighting is how others have their lighting set when viewing pics. My office setting is typically pretty bright in regards to back lighting, but when I g to other loacations and look at the same pics, the lighting may be a bit dark with the settings on the workstation. What I see below the "9" on the workstation at home is three quarters of a square, with a circular hoe in the middle that was struck twice on the field. I'll look at a obverse/reverse pic and see if a die clash is possible in that area.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 05/07/2014  2:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Looks like a contact mark, die scratch and die flow going on in that area to make you think it is an extra "D". It happens. If it were an extra mint mark punch, it would be raised higher than what you are looking at. It would be way taller than a die scratch if it were an errant punch.
Pillar of the Community
Collector-Corner's Avatar
872 Posts
 Posted 05/07/2014  9:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Collector-Corner to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Some of Wexler's examples are lighter than this one is. This will be one that goes in the 2nd box going to John when he is back in business.
Pillar of the Community
Rackster's Avatar
United States
4809 Posts
 Posted 05/08/2014  07:59 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Rackster to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I suppose that the witness marks vary from surface abrasion to obvious gouging. For a novice like me, its hard to make distinctions. The 1960 D I spoke of in another thread under high magnification (I have special equipment here at work) showed a bulge to be old PMD. Then there's the case that too much magnification can lead to new conclusions the other way. So I'll take Coops advice to look and look again when either confirming or refuting an earlier conclusion. Even to the extent of putting it down a while to pick up later.

Good stuff - pursue something until you're satisfied and seek input from knowledgeable folks. Modify theory.
Pillar of the Community
Collector-Corner's Avatar
872 Posts
 Posted 05/08/2014  11:40 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Collector-Corner to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@Rackster
Its definately something, just not sure what it is. I'll let the expert make the determination when he is available. Its only $4.00 and time, so its no big deal. I have other connections that will eventually look it over as well. Right now it will sit in the same container that will be sent in for attribution.

Sometimes a lower power magnification is good, but for clarity, a higher power is needed to see what is going on. On this issue, a lower magnification was worthless.

I am a strong believer in staying under 10x magnification if at all possible, since many attributors and TPG's consider anything above 10x "minor". This particular issue isn't about money or claim to fame. I could care less if my name or anyone else's name is attached to a finding. I only consider attributions if they have been clearly accepted by 2-3 separate parties.

For this coin, its about learning whats going on here so it can be documented and if it shows up again, easily identified. I have a roll of this coin, and I am going to look for others with the same issue. I put them down last night to catch up on a few other things around the office.

Guesses are nice, but show me the proof through analysis, comprehension and understanding. All else is futile.
Edited by Collector-Corner
05/08/2014 11:50 am
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,870Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to rattle this change. Forums