Two things...
first, it's not a Cud. That term is reserved for coins struck with dies that have pieces broken off the edge. So, Cuds always affect the edge of the design at the rim.
Second, 1955S-1MM-002, an RPM, has a mintmark position similar to that coin, and in later stages has die breaks inside both of the upper 5s of the date. Looks like you could have one of those, but not so fast...
A LOT of 1955 cents, especially D and S mint have die breaks in the date. Just a really bad year for cents.
first, it's not a Cud. That term is reserved for coins struck with dies that have pieces broken off the edge. So, Cuds always affect the edge of the design at the rim.
Second, 1955S-1MM-002, an RPM, has a mintmark position similar to that coin, and in later stages has die breaks inside both of the upper 5s of the date. Looks like you could have one of those, but not so fast...
A LOT of 1955 cents, especially D and S mint have die breaks in the date. Just a really bad year for cents.






















