Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1780 Thaler - But Precisely What Type?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 4,800Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
austrokiwi's Avatar
2087 Posts
 Posted 06/17/2014  10:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add austrokiwi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Lucky Cuss, the two dots in the central Austrian sheild is a mint mark to the Vienna Mint.


Small clarification I believe it was an unobtrusive authentication mark. Vienna mint wasn't the only one to use it the Swiss Gold Abschlag( Abschlag sounds so much better than "off-metal-strike") has those dots, and I wouldn't be surprised if some Rome mint coins also had it
Pillar of the Community
Lucky Cuss's Avatar
United States
4883 Posts
 Posted 06/17/2014  5:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Lucky Cuss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Lucky Cuss, the two dots in the central Austrian sheild is a mint mark to the Vienna Mint.


Oh. Thanks for the link to the other thread (albeit I haven't gotten through all 26 pages of it yet). I hadn't realized there was such a comprehensive discussion already here, but I ought to have guessed as much. I do see that these dots and their significance are mentioned early on there. However, my #1 (the better struck specimen) does not have them. So exactly what does that indicate, if anything? Even if the dots do verify that a coin was struck at Vienna, it doesn't follow as a logical necessity that their absence means that a coin was struck elsewhere, even though that may be in fact what is the case.

Edit: I should add that I'm now wavering on my previous thought that #1 and #2 are of the same type, despite the coincidence of their weights and similarity in dimensions.
Colligo ergo sum
Edited by Lucky Cuss
06/18/2014 3:19 pm
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2014  12:28 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
an unobtrusive authentication mark


Yes, this is a more proper attribution than a mint mark. Thanks austrokiwi.
  Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 4,800Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.25 seconds to rattle this change. Forums