I wouldn't denigrate archaelologists. I was trained in archaeology; all that inspires it is a quest for knowledge. There's no blanket hatred of collectors. But when the value of artifacts causes looters to violate the context of a deposit, that knowledge is lost forever. A hoard like this is looked at very differently by archaeologists; the variety of coins gives a window into the money in use at the time of the deposit, but it's an incredibly narrow snapshot. It's just the result of the action of one person, or a very few, in the space of an hour's time. There's virtually no context of a community or a span of time. Once the coins are identified, just about all the available knowledge has been gleaned. A good archaeologist wouldn't begrudge the coins then going into the hands of collectors, especially if the proceeds fund further research, or broaden the dissemination of knowledge as a whole.