Two Interesting 1932 Romania 100 Lei Silver Coins

Coin A is a modern fake. What you describe as the letters being more "swollen" is a very common sign of that. Also, the edge reeds are irregular compared to the genuine coin. You magnetic slide results put the nail in the coffin on this one.
Looks like relatively thick plating and probably a lead alloy core. You can see on the bust where some of the outside metal broke off.
They are certainly not from the same dies, as there are other differences too.

Can coin B be a test coin? That is, the Mint did some tests on the die by those debased metals before pressing the real silver alloy. Henry

I brought this older topic up because I have the same odd looking coin. But in my case, the coin takes about 5 seconds to slide down the magnet. So it doesn't compare to the interesting one in the post. It's closer to the genuine coin. I bring it up to suggest if the OP is still here to do a density test. My coin is also a dull looking coin and the letters aren't so sharp, but it does compare to .500 silver- although not exactly. It might be error or maybe it's the alloy mix but it doesn't seem likely to be a counterfeit. I calculated .500 silver to be 9.66g/cc based on presumption the other half is pure copper. That may not be true. The density of my similar coin is 9.64 which is not9.66. In order for density to be 9.64, I calculate the alloy should be .510 copper and .490 silver. So I figure mine is likely genuine instead of fake. Otherwise what would be the point since the coin is the proper size, weight and comparable density. If fake, something prominent would be out of line somewhere. So I brought this topic back to life to suggest to the OP to try a density test and see how that comes out. If you have a number of say 7-something or 8-something instead of a 9.6 or so then you can figure it may be a fake but with better data to support that belief. I buy fakes. I wish I had it.

I had to lower image quality to reduce file size but here it is. The OP says the coin weighs 13.96 grams. Mine weighs 13.9571 grams. It would round up to 13.96 if the resolution was less. Pretty darn close for two different coins by two different people using two different measures at two different times.

Yes I'm sure it is a good coin. Do you have the ability to determine density of your interesting coin? I admit it has been an important part of my collecting that went unanswered for many years. I finally decided that I had to spend a lot of money in order to get good results. It was costly, but I'm glad to get good data instead of not knowing.

I too was bothered by % of error with small coins and zero confidence. The magnet is useful, but it is not foolproof. I've never had buyers remorse after investing a lot of money to buy quality lab equipment that gives me confidence in knowing instead of having that lingering doubt or uncertainty.