Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1952 D/D/D...but I Have A Question About The 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,040Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
AMB's Avatar
United States
801 Posts
 Posted 09/02/2014  12:23 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add AMB to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Here is a 1952D 1MM-016, markers pictured for confirmation.
The 2 in the year has a squared notch in the bottom left field and an outline line in the lower portion of the loop...just wondered if it's doubled? The 5 and 9 have very minor notching at the bottoms of the devices too. Opinions? Thx.

1952-D/D/D...but-I-Have-A-Question-About-The-2

1952-D/D/D...but-I-Have-A-Question-About-The-2

1952-D/D/D...but-I-Have-A-Question-About-The-2

1952-D/D/D...but-I-Have-A-Question-About-The-2

1952-D/D/D...but-I-Have-A-Question-About-The-2

1952-D/D/D...but-I-Have-A-Question-About-The-2

1952-D/D/D...but-I-Have-A-Question-About-The-2
Edited by AMB
09/02/2014 12:26 am
Pillar of the Community
United States
1915 Posts
 Posted 09/02/2014  12:41 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add seal006 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The short answer to your question about the 2 is, no. Further exlanation is it apears to be circulation wear. Also when you have identified an RPM, and verified it through markers and/or overlays look at the description on coppercoins for that RPM. If there is no mention of doubling then there will not be on your coin unless it is the less desirable Machine Doubling or Die Deterioration Doubling. The reason for this is that collectible doubled dies are "hub doubling". What this means is that it occours during the process of hubbing the "working die", which is the die used to strike coins. This means that every planchet that is struck with that die will show the doubling. Now of course you could have hub doubling on the reverse of an RPM that you may not find on other coins with the same RPM. This is because the dies were swapped out once they were deemed unusable.

I think it is very important for everyone that wants to collect varieties to read how these varieties come to be. If you understand what causes them you will start to understand how something you are seeing just cannot be what you might think it is because it would not be possible in the minting process. Wexler has a ton of useful info on his website. I go back and still read it from time to time just to refresh my memory. I also always seem to walk away having learned something I did not understand before.
Pillar of the Community
AMB's Avatar
United States
801 Posts
 Posted 09/02/2014  01:12 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add AMB to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thx, will do...it's a nice DDD anyhow 😁
Pillar of the Community
AMB's Avatar
United States
801 Posts
 Posted 09/02/2014  01:44 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add AMB to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hey seal, Here's a thought though...the RPM 1957D 007 is listed as a D/D. An email from James Wiles he admits additional divided serifs are present which would indicate a DDD...he says that they are so minor that it's not enough to change the listing. So could there possibly be other minor errors out there the experts kinda discounted as "not enough to be relevant?"...I'd hope not, but they did on the 1957D 007. Just a thought.
Edited by AMB
09/02/2014 01:48 am
Pillar of the Community
United States
1915 Posts
 Posted 09/02/2014  02:09 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add seal006 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sure there could be, but that is just it, they were "too minor." Anomalies like the ones you are pointing to would not be "too minor" if they were true doubling. You would be able to see it with very little magnification. I think most of the too minor stuff is on RPMs not doubled dies. RPMs are more common than true doubled dies to begin with. I have discovered two RPMs that had never been listed before that I was given credit as the person that "discovered" these RPMs. I also have about two full tubes of "too minor" to list RPMs. Most are tilted or rotated and show extremely minor notching in one or both serifs. I keep them in the off chance one attributor will get bored one day and list a few of them. If you want easy to find doubled dies look at memorial cents from around 1997-2006. Look on the reverse. Look for minor doubling of a column next to Lincolns statue. You will also find doubling on the statue with the knees and feet. Coppercoins does list some of these, but I would bet that there are a dozen or more not listed for any given year because they are just too minor.
Pillar of the Community
AMB's Avatar
United States
801 Posts
 Posted 09/02/2014  02:19 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add AMB to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That's the great thing about RPM's they are abundant and particular decades have their oddities too. I'm still trudging through the 50's...couple more gallon containers to plow through...the 90's will have to wait. Talking about minor errors and controversies, there have been a lot of difference of opinion regarding a few coins I notice listed or "d-listed". OMM's, die cracks or scratches that resembled something other than what they were.
So with that in mind I'm never afraid to question anything, ...have to ask, and never appeal to authority, no matter if they wrote the book. Thx
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 09/02/2014  03:37 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
No RPMs on 1990 forward. The mint mark is part of the design of the die.
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,040Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.24 seconds to rattle this change. Forums