| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,127 |
|
Pillar of the Community
968 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
That's pretty high grade, with excellent cameo contrast, and while I can't tell how reflective the fields are from those photos, I suspect it's at least semi-prooflike. Just a hint of scuffing on the high points, with a clean looking face. Don't see anything that ought to keep it from receiving an MS65 grade.
Colligo ergo sum
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
709 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2368 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
I'm 50% sure it's PL. As far as the grade, I'll say 64 or 64+.
|
|
Valued Member
South Africa
453 Posts |
Ms 64 I think, great coin
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36883 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
MS64. The photos make it look like cartwheel, so maybe not PL? Nice eye appeal regardless.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
Seems to have quite a bit of chatter in the fields, I want to say MS-63 on this one.
Could be PL, but it's hard to tell with this set of images.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 968 Posts |
It's definitely PL, just FYI. I'd grade it 63PL, a middling 63 too. Too much chatter in the fields and the cheek isn't clean enough to be a 64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
 MS-63 |
|
Pillar of the Community
Israel
2420 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
416 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1584 Posts |
64 or better. It's tough for any coin to withstand this level of digital scrutiny without taking a hit. Great looking coin.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
70 Posts |
It seems as though it has to much chatter to be a 64.
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,127 |
Posted 09/03/2014 01:00 am
