| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 4,589 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
567 Posts |
I always like learning more about coins, and am looking for a new one, so show me your favorite coin in this price range and make your case for why you think it's the best one!
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3772 Posts |
Easy answer for me:  Marius - Gallo-Roman Emperor for a short while in AD269 Antoninianus from Cologne mint Sear(Millenium Ed)#1119b RIC#7 IMP C MARIVS PF AVG CONCORDIA [MILI]TVM Paid A$65 (was just over US$50 at the time) a few years ago.
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
435 Posts |
OK here is my current favourite, hence my avatar. But I have to warn you that my favourite changes almost daily. It is one of the commoner types of Greek tetradrachm, so you can get a decent condition, nice big silver coin for your cash. It's main appeal is that I find it so attractive. I love it's beautiful, somewhat chaotic, design and I always look out for ancient coins with a snake...and this one has plenty! SNAKES!    MYSIA, PERGAMON. AR Cistophoric Tetradrachm. c.92-88BC. 28mm, 12.67g. Obv. Cista Mystica with serpent all within ivy wreath. Rev. Bow case with serpents; Pergamon monogram to left. Î"Η and monogram above, serpent entwined staff to right. Ref. SNG France 1732-3; Kleiner, Pergamon 31; Pinder 106. 
Edited by Valecrucis 10/01/2014 10:13 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3772 Posts |
How many Roman-Egyptian Tetradrachm with Agathodaemon reverse do you have? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4778 Posts |
This one will not grab the attention of those mainly interested in aesthetics, but I think the coin merits at least some points in its rarity and history. Roman era coinage greatly overshadow the coins of what came after Rome's fall in the west, so naturally coinage of the post-Roman barbarian kingdoms aren't as well known or collected (although there are enough specialists to keep the prices on post-Roman rarities relatively high). I happen to be a passionate collector (when my budget allows, that is) of this kind of coinage, a big reason being the very interesting history behind them. My favorite of these coin-issuing entities is the Ostrogothic Kingdom (of Italy), from 493 (17 years after the Western Roman Empire's fall) to 552 AD. My particular example is a half-follis, struck under the authority of King Theodoric the Great and incorporating Roman themes into the design. Like all other Ostrogothic coinage, it is a very rare coin, especially in this shape. More info on my thread here: https://goccf.com/t/185539Municipal Coinage of Rome, Ostrogothic Kingdom AE Half-Follis (20 nummi) Obv: IMVIC-TA ROMA, Roma helmeted, facing right Rev: She-wolf standing left, suckling Romulus and Remus, two stars above, XX in ex Mint: Rome (struck 493-526 AD) Ref: BMC 30 
Edited by VisigothKing 10/01/2014 10:37 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
435 Posts |
Sadly I have none of those Medieval. I am not sure that my Pergamon tet qualifies. Strictly speaking those two serpents were Egyptian. Same motif though. I have my eyes out for a nice one that is also the necessary bargain.  For everyone else's info: The two sacred serpents of Egypt were the agathodaemon and the uraeus. Both serpents are found in Egyptian religion from earliest times, and the uraeus was always closely associated with the divine kingship of the pharoah. During the Roman period, the agathodaemon was identified with Sarapis, while the uraeus was sacred to Isis.
Edited by Valecrucis 10/01/2014 10:47 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
513 Posts |
I love Republican Rome coins so here's my favorite in that range from that era:  A Republican Rome denarius minted in Rome in 84 BC. 3.961g, 20.7mm, Obverse: diademed and cloaked bust of Apollo (possibly Vejovius) left, from behind, brandishing thunderbolt Reverse: Minerva in quadriga right, holding spear and shield, C•LICINIVS•L•F / MACER in ex I love coins with non-standard obverses, and for Republican Denarii this is a great example.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3772 Posts |
While it does not fall into the price range mentioned (paid ~$20 for it), seeing the image of the quadriga tempted me to post this:  Next year after the above coin with quadriga  Sear[ME]#279 Denarius Serratus of "Q.Antonius Balbus" - 83BC Very nice double strike I think. Postscript: As stated by 'chuy1530' many of the Republican denarii have pleasant designs and are comparably cheap in decent grades.
Edited by Medieval 10/01/2014 11:11 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
513 Posts |
Here's another nice Republican Denarius in that price range. On this one it isn't so much the specific design I like (although I do like it), but the detail on it is amazing. It goes to show the quality you can get in the range you mentioned. Of course you can get even better looking Imperial Roman coins for less money, but those tend to have smelly real people on them instead of idealized entities :D  A Roman Republic Denarius minted in Rome between 111-110 BC. 3.811 g, 17.6 mm Obverse: helmeted head of Roma right, circular symbol or device behind Reverse: Victory in a triga right, AP•CL•T•MAL•Q•VR (MAL and VR in monogram) in ex Also note this one has the relatively rare "triga" (three horses) as opposed to the more common quadriga (four horses.)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5181 Posts |
Something that I probably can't afford. I don't go around spending $50 on coins (heck, I only did that the one time way back in 2011). As far as coins worth around $10 go... in my own country, I would've probably mentioned Pantikapaion copper from the 3rd-2nd centuries BC (it's been awfully common these days now that the site in question is actually in my country, as opposed to being just over the border). Elsewhere - I suppose you could try to find a nice AE3 of Theodosius II; I have one, but maybe I just got very lucky.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2480 Posts |
This is a difficult question! I have many from that price range-- most of my collection so far consists of coins in the ~$15-$200 range. I love them all. Admittedly though, many coins in my collection came from large mixed lots so the price is low due to quantity (and quality is not high). More recently I've moved to acquiring fewer coins of higher quality and/or rarity. Instead of showing one favorite or recommendation, I've somewhat randomly selected fifteen of my coins which are in that price range. Images are not to relative scale.  Left to right, top to bottom: 1. SICILY, Syracuse. AE tetras, 14mm. 390 BC 2. THRACE, Chersonesos. AR hemidrachm, 13mm, 400-350 BC 3. EUBOIA, Histiaia. AR tetrobol, 13mm. 340-330 BC 4. ARGOLIS, Argos. AR hemidrachm, 13mm. 330-270 BC 5. SELEUKID KINGS, Seleukos I. AR tetradrachm in the style of Alexander the Great, 27 mm. 295-291 BC 6. IONIA, Klazomenai. AR diobol, 9mm. 499-494 BC 7. PTOLEMAIC KINGDOM OF EGYPT, Ptolemy II. AE obol, 22 mm. 285-246 BC 8. KINGDOM OF PERSIS, Unknown king, possibly Vadfradad (Autophradates) II. AR hemidrachm. Mid-second century BC 9. ROMAN REPUBLIC, moneyer L. Postumius. AR denarius. 131 BC 10. PHOENICIA, Arados. Trajan. AE 22mm. 116/7 AD 11. THRACE, Pautalia. Caracalla. AE 29mm, 198-217 AD 12. MOESIA INFERIOR, Marcianopolis. Macrinus, with Diadumenian. AE 27mm. 217/8 AD 13. EGYPT, Alexandria. Antoninus Pius billion tetradrachm, 24 mm. 138/9 AD 14. EGYPT, Alexandria. Claudius II Gothicus potin tetradrachm. 268 AD 15. ROMAN IMPERIAL, Trajan. AR denarius, 18 mm. 101-102 AD For some reason I left out a slew of my favorite Ptolemaic bronzes. Those certainly give a lot of bang for the buck. I love the type and have a dozen or more. Unless you're shooting for super quality or gargantuan size (>40mm) you will be able to find scores of examples in your desired price range. Here's an example of a 42mm from Ptolemy VI although it did cost more than your desired price. I must've misfiled my other pictures of similar examples from your price range.  Edited to add: of the pictured coins, only two were "blind" purchases from large mixed lots (the Trajan denarius and the Postumius denarius, which cost ~$15 each).
Edited by ThisIsFun 10/02/2014 07:58 am
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
435 Posts |
Perhaps the lower limit of $50 was unnecessary. I appreciate the maximum of $200 to stop the occasional person posting their museum pieces photographed on real Ferrari red backgrounds, making the rest of us jealous. But no coin is too humble in my eyes, if it is a little unusual or is cherished.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5155 Posts |
This is a tough one.... VasuDeva of Zabulistan Turko-Hephthalite Hunnic Afghanistan ca.685 AD AR Drachm Senmerv Crown Type. Tri-lingual. Nezak (Nspk) Huns Kingdom of Zabul Vakhu (Vasu)-Deva, Sub-ruler of Shahi Tigin Circa 720-738 AD Ref. Göbl Hunnen Em. 244 31.8 mm x 3.28g. Die position=12h Obverse: Bust of Vasu Deva right in Persian style. Bull head above crown ; 'thunderbolt' countermark, Gold plug countermark. Brahmi legend in field. Cursive Bactrian Greek Legend around. Reverse: Zoroastrian fire altar and attendants. Pahlavi legend in fields, Cursive Bactrian Greek Legend around. Note: Holed. Gold Plugged in antiquity. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
My new favorite coin. I won this today on ebay for under $30 , sellers pictures. AR Drachm Khusro II 580-628 AD Sasasanian Empire, King of Persia 31mm X 4 grams Thanks to Anoob who is the resident expert on this coin type I had some more info. It is from the Addashir mint in Khuzastan province, regional year 35 which makes it 624 AD. Brief article on him http://www.cachecoins.org/persian01.htm 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
513 Posts |
Nicer and clearer than a similar coin a paid a little more for.
Really, the amount you pay for a coin is less dependent on what the coin is/condition and more dependent on how patient you're willing to be to get it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5155 Posts |
Chuy you hit the nail on the head. Well said.
Ski, you got a wonderful example, superb in every way. The coin is not perfect, good thing because the minor faults almost insure its authenticity. Well played.
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 4,589 |