I know that pricing is a sore subject with some ( love to see how many YMMV people chime in whenever it gets brought up )but I tend to be a "logic seeker" and some things I see in price lists -
ATB - just make no sense.
For instance, my "want list" for cert Walkers contains only 2 coins at present. 1942-S MS66 and 1942-D MS67
What baffles me is that the population on these two in PCGS ( and relatively similar on NGC etc. ) shows:
448 MS66 1942-S and 48 higher
148 MS67 1942-D and 8 higher
Add that 67's are obviously usually more coveted than 66's for most coins and logic would tell me that the 42-D should be considerably more valuable and priced as such! Only 1/3 the overall population exists, and only 1/9 are graded higher.
But NOOOOOOO, the 66 42-S retails at around $1200 while the 67 42-D retails around $900.
I just don't get it? If it is that much rarer in population why so much less in price? Crack-outs and such just cannot explain such a huge discrepancy, IMO.
What else is at play here? Is there some weird "false impression" that one is rarer than the other despite the hard numbers not bearing that out?

Was it rare way back when and the pricing never adjusted? I see this in other series some too. One or two outliers that defy logic of rarity/pop being the major driver of price.
I think some of it is the rarity of SanFran Walkers in general and at high grades - they tend to be much weaker struck in several key areas. So that explains poorer struck coins getting relatively higher grades, but it just doesn't make any sense to me pop.-wise that it would be that bass-ackwards.