| Author |
 Replies: 21 / Views: 2,622 |
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
I really you can see what I am seeing., And hope you're able to see as what you want to be able to see. I was experimenting with very low light. Trying to keep thr glare down. Is why kinda dark. But a really cool Coin. Great dye and great ew great example. Well it's correct? Right? Thanks as always       |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
Hi Joey - the pictures are getting better; keep at it!! The date looks normal but I'm trying to get a closer look at LIBERTY. Do you see notching in the letters? (lower left)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
282 Posts |
Yes there's notching on LIBERTY. All devices are same size accross LIB and date. I will attment to get seperationm to show. And the side by side Dbling on all. marks on the date are correct place. I'll pull coin now and add pics.
Also. I'm taking pics on CAM on full size/quality/ The3n resizimg tg fullest with the resizer/upload here on site. Think it should be the best. Any comments. Like better to take Orig pics as close to posting size or the way I am.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
This date Pic from recent set shows ths smae as on Coppercoins. I also added EAR. Will take other pics now,    |
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
Also this LIBERTY pic on file and edited a little to show nocthing if at least on the "1"  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
Hi Joey - The pictures of the date show significant doubling that is too significant for 1DO-001. I also don't see this in the other pictures where the date is captured making me suspect that the doubling is related to Die Deterioration. Can you get a new, sharper image of LIBERTY? The confirmation of notching there will go a long way to IDing your coin. |
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
yes I add pic of liberty when I return from errands.Yhanks
|
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
I know pics ar3e little fark. But I felt it besr showed that FBLING and noching in a netter way. The DBLING showedm\ to lrg due to the magnifier on the earlier post. Please note the areq below the. Is as it should ne for this? And the back of head?    |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
Hi Joey - sorry, but it looks like a normal 1980 LMC. The early 80s coins are often blurred from deteriorating dies. I've been looking for a 1980 DDO without luck and have seen a number of ugly specimens. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
853 Posts |
I agree that it looks normal. Also Joey, please proofread before hitting "submit reply".
|
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
This should settle all The Obv pic is the one. Notching in the "1" is visible + all other devices should be able to be seen. RACKSTER, I hope you are here to reply. And see this Pic.. Coop you also I'm hoping you can see and reply. Please verify if you can. Would like to move on to other posts I want to focus on. Maybe finally move forward with confidence on my ebay site without the fear of hassles and with support and confidence of the community. Thanks, more coming.    |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
853 Posts |
I still say no. Look at the difference.   |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
Hi Joey - still looks like a regular 1980 LMC. Coop can have the final say before you release your coin, but I think it's probably safe to do so. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I still see a normal coin. Note the upper loop of you coin on the "0" has a flattened area at 1:00. If it were from this die, then all the devices would look the same as the attributed die 001. The rest of the date is normal in size compared with Jay's images.
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,622 |
Posted 11/05/2014 10:43 pm
