| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,688 |
|
|
New Member
New Zealand
48 Posts |
  I am new at this - this is my first attempt. I'm going to say EF40
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3546 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Nice Walker...  AU-50
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
The places to look for wear on Walkers is on the diameter. On the obverse: along the line of Liberty's body and left leg, on the reverse: along the slanting line of the eagle's body from the head to the bottom of the left leg.
These two diameters show up quite strongly on worn examples, because they are ridges of high points in the design. Sometimes I have considered if these ridges are a design weakness in an otherwise superb example of neoclassic coin art.
Particularly look at the detail on Liberty's head, the eyebrow of the eagle, and the feather detail on the left leg of the eagle.
Edited by sel_69l 01/05/2015 07:24 am
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I'm leaning towards AU53. I'm thinking most of the missing detail is strike issues.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
A lot more coins were produced per year for the war years. It is reasonable to assume that wartime issues were more lightly struck to extend die life. The result is that it is common for feather detail to show up less sharply on MS grade coins.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1566 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
Definitely a weak strike; characteristic of the 1941-S Walkers. That of course makes it difficult to grade since you have to separate a weak strike from wear. Certainly AU; whether it can make a low MS is problematic.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
Does anyone else see hairlines from a possible cleaning? Maybe I'm just seeing things. Otherwise nice coin. AU50
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
711 Posts |
Not sure if these are hairlines or whatnot, but I see something going across the sun's ray closest to Lady Liberty.
As for grading, I would go AU details.
|
|
New Member
 New Zealand
48 Posts |
Well the results are better than expected! But I still think it is important to err on the side of caution when grading a coin. I would be very embarrassed if I 'over graded' a coin and then one day sold it on to an dissastisfied customer
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18668 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
It appears to be around AU-53 or 55 to me. A lot of the S mint walkers are typically weak. The amount of mint luster remaining is much more typical for an AU than a EF.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3546 Posts |
Quote: ...anyone else see hairlines... The optimal way to identify whizzing, for example, is to hold the coin at a 120 degree angle to the lens (with 90 degrees being when the coin is flat on a surface). But even when the coin is held at this angle it probably will be necessary to position the light source at various angles to capture the presence of any fine hairlines...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,688 |
|