| Author |
Replies: 28,012 / Views: 2,317,030 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
593 Posts |
I've found clad proofs in boxes before that some idiot has purposely vandalized that would have otherwise been keepers, if they didn't want it don't destroy it someone else might want it
|
|
Moderator
 United States
192314 Posts |
I agree. Even if it can be cleaned up with acetone, it is still a classless move. Shame on them.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5216 Posts |
4 boxes from Friday  I had been getting 8 boxes on Friday the last 4 weeks since I had time to dump that much. They were OK but not great. So I scaled it back to my normal 4 boxes and then the silver came out  Box 1 had an ender. 6 40%ers, a 1964, and a minor clip. Box 2 had 5 40%ers. Box 3 was a skunk. Box 4 had 17 40%ers.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
840 Posts |
J77's post reminded me I found a really nice 87-P in a box a couple years ago. Unfortunately, the obverse of the 87-P and a handful of other Cu-Ni clad coins that would have otherwise been MS had purposely been scratched. I'll never know who did this and why, but the picture in my mind was a jilted woman upset with her man because his passion was for coins, not her...Permanently damaging an otherwise beautiful coin is uncool!
Edited by berto 02/14/2017 12:10 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
192314 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1157 Posts |
4 boxes, 1 x 40%. Nuff said. Good luck out there!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
177 Posts |
Today boxes yielded 7 silver. 4 90% and 3 40%. The 90% were a 1942s, 2 1964, and 1893 Columbus half dollar. This is the first Columbus I have found. So pretty excited about it. It has some kind of black stuff on it. Some of it came off with water and a little scrub but didn't try anything else. Good luck everyone!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1157 Posts |
nice finds big7mag! especially the 1893. I found one too, my oldest half found. Congrats,
|
|
Valued Member
United States
177 Posts |
Is the 1893 Columbus actually made in the year 1893. Or was it made newer and they put 1893/1892 on it?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1157 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
177 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
449 Posts |
I too have found proofs, NIFC or other great looking coins that have been purposefully damaged. Just because it's not a coin you want or collect there's no reason to ruin it for someone who does want/need it for their collection. About a year ago I got a loose Franklin half from a bank that had a fresh scratch on it as if someone took a knife and went across the obverse of the coin. You could tell it was a fresh scratch because it was still shiny inside the scratch. As best I remember at that time it was a coin that I needed as a hole filler for my Dansco. I know it's still got the same silver value, but what did that person get out of damaging the coin? Nothing.
Edited by RCook 02/15/2017 09:50 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1157 Posts |
scratching a 90% is different than scratching a proof or NIFC. The latter is to track the movement of the dumps. I would bet that the former was a person who wanted to see if it was actually silver. Or, an accident. As I type this out, this does seem obvious lol.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2111 Posts |
"LOVE THE HUNT!"
Edited by arby96 02/15/2017 11:20 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
192314 Posts |
Quote: I suggest not to use Acetone it too harsh of a chemical Point of clarification. Acetone will not hurt the coin at all, but it may be harsh to your skin with prolonged exposure.
|
| |
Replies: 28,012 / Views: 2,317,030 |